Ochre
:o
5 from WA in the squad is nice to see
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What were the comments? I don’t mean loved by the public, I mean the team and coaching staff etc.
Whisteblowers get treated worse than those who perpetrate. Look at David McBride.
Bancroft alluded to the bowlers knowing about the ball being doctored. The bowlers released a group statement to vehemently deny the supposed allegation. It was alluded to in a pretty soft way but the media grabbed it with both hands.
Considering that bowlers instruct captains and fielders how they want the ball prepared and they can obviously tell with one quick glance or feel which side is being worked on and which isn't - I find it difficult to believe professional cricketers did not know something was going on.
Maybe not the sandpaper itself, but surely they would have noticed the ball being different than when there was no sandpaper.
Considering that bowlers instruct captains and fielders how they want the ball prepared and they can obviously tell with one quick glance or feel which side is being worked on and which isn't - I find it difficult to believe professional cricketers did not know something was going on.
Maybe not the sandpaper itself, but surely they would have noticed the ball being different than when there was no sandpaper.
5 from WA in the squad is nice to see
I can't remember the specifics of the time between the break in play and then the camera on Banners and whether play continued for some time thereafter by which stage the ball had been tampered with.
The idea was orchestrated during the lunch or tea break, right? It's unclear whether Cam was saying the bowlers knew from the inception of the plan or whether they would have known once they got hands on the ball.
From there I'm also unsure as to whether the plan was able to be executed or he got caught immediately on his first try. If that was the situation then he would be suggesting the bowlers found out during the change room break, which is far more serious.
Isn't the implied story that Warner had been tampering with it for ages, we'd gotten reverse swing in the home Ashes that summer which is not what happens in Aus normally, but they suspected SA were onto them that tour which is why Bancroft took over instead.I can't remember the specifics of the time between the break in play and then the camera on Banners and whether play continued for some time thereafter by which stage the ball had been tampered with.
The idea was orchestrated during the lunch or tea break, right? It's unclear whether Cam was saying the bowlers knew from the inception of the plan or whether they would have known once they got hands on the ball.
From there I'm also unsure as to whether the plan was able to be executed or he got caught immediately on his first try. If that was the situation then he would be suggesting the bowlers found out during the change room break, which is far more serious.
You seem to be assuming it was the first time they'd done it.
Isn't the implied story that Warner had been tampering with it for ages, we'd gotten reverse swing in the home Ashes that summer which is not what happens in Aus normally, but they suspected SA were onto them that tour which is why Bancroft took over instead.
'Bailey was also categoric in denying that Bancroft's non-selection, despite being the leading run-scorer in Shield cricket over the last two years, had been for anything other than cricketing reasons, in reference to his infamous interview in England in 2021 following the Sandpaper incident in 2018.
' "I'm glad you asked that because I wanted to touch on it. It's categorically no," Bailey said. "And I've shared this with Cameron on a number of occasions. That has never at any stage been discussed from the panel's perspective. It's purely a cricketing decision. There is not a member of the team that would have an issue with Cam playing. We certainly don't have an issue with it. I think a lot of people tend to forget the fact that Cam's actually played Test cricket since returning from the ban. It was a long time ago. We've all moved well past that. I'd be disappointed if people were looking to that as a reason. All I can do is reiterate to you and to Cam that's not the case. Never has been and never will be." '
George, I don't believe you...
'Bailey was also categoric in denying that Bancroft's non-selection, despite being the leading run-scorer in Shield cricket over the last two years, had been for anything other than cricketing reasons, in reference to his infamous interview in England in 2021 following the Sandpaper incident in 2018.
' "I'm glad you asked that because I wanted to touch on it. It's categorically no," Bailey said. "And I've shared this with Cameron on a number of occasions. That has never at any stage been discussed from the panel's perspective. It's purely a cricketing decision. There is not a member of the team that would have an issue with Cam playing. We certainly don't have an issue with it. I think a lot of people tend to forget the fact that Cam's actually played Test cricket since returning from the ban. It was a long time ago. We've all moved well past that. I'd be disappointed if people were looking to that as a reason. All I can do is reiterate to you and to Cam that's not the case. Never has been and never will be." '
George, I don't believe you...
That we don’t really know exactly what happened and who knew what is why the story still lingers like an unflushable turd.
The full explanation has never been provided and the nonselection of Bancroft would indicate he’s the only one still being punished for his involvement
Ok, but since that time Renshaw has scores of 5*, 0, 2 and 2, for an average of 3.00.Bancroft played the first two tests in the 2019 ashes series in England when Paine was captain and Langer was coach. Hasn’t played since Harris replaced him in that series after the second test
Scores by openers for Australia in that series
Warner - 2,8,3,5,61,0,0,0,5,11
(95@9.50)
Bancroft - 8,7,13,16
(44@11.00)
Harris - 8,19,13,6,3,9
(58@9.66)
Bowlers 100% had to know. Anyone who's played at a decent level knows this. Bancroft is the most convenient fall guy. Simple as that.Bancroft alluded to the bowlers knowing about the ball being doctored. The bowlers released a group statement to vehemently deny the supposed allegation. It was alluded to in a pretty soft way but the media grabbed it with both hands.
Umpires also expected that ball not long afterwards and found no sign of tampering too
I can see a universe where Warner has a brilliant idea
"Life under the bus"It's a poor part of Australian society, sadly.
Whisteblowers get treated worse than those who perpetrate. Look at David McBride.
Will be eagerly awaiting Bancroft's autobiography one day. One chapter on leg side dismissals, the rest of it on Sandpaper Gate haha.