An inconvenient truth

[stompie]

Your sex life has no part to play in global warming, nor does it have anything to do with the idealogy of the left wing.

Sex and politics as not the distinct issues as you believe them to be. If you pickup a university newspaper, you will find that the left-wing devotes considerable resources to attacking females that wear mini-shirts, or those females that show any kind of appreciation towards anything. As these females are always being attacked, by default, the obnoxious left-wing woman is left as the ideal that women should aspire to be like, and that men should aspire to attain. As sex is a powerful motivator, the left-wing is thus empowered with a level of desirability that it does not deserve. In turn, this identity assimilates people towards it, as they too want some level of desirability. Once the identity is assimilated, inductees will support any issue that is deemed to be in the interest of the left-wing. Opposing the Greenhouse effect is one of many such issues.

Talking about my sexual preferences is one way of demonstrating that the left-wing is not as desirable as some left-wingers believe it to be. I appreciate that one voice does not make a huge difference, and I also appreciate that my one voice is being drowned out by the thousands of voices that control the ABC, Fairfax, the Public Service, and University newspapers around Australia. That said, sponsoring a third-world child doesn't make a huge difference to alleviating global poverty either, yet it is no reason to keep one's hands in one's pockets. All we can do is be true to ourselves. If I can save one man from wasting time with a left-wing sheila, or save one lady from becoming a left-wing sheila, then I can feel like I’ve made a difference.

 

[Monkster]

Sex and politics as not the distinct issues as you believe them to be. If you pickup a university newspaper, you will find that the left-wing devotes considerable resources to attacking females that wear mini-shirts, or those females that show any kind of appreciation towards anything. As these females are always being attacked, by default, the obnoxious left-wing woman is left as the ideal that women should aspire to be like, and that men should aspire to attain. As sex is a powerful motivator, the left-wing is thus empowered with a level of desirability that it does not deserve. In turn, this identity assimilates people towards it, as they too want some level of desirability. Once the identity is assimilated, inductees will support any issue that is deemed to be in the interest of the left-wing. Opposing the Greenhouse effect is one of many such issues.

Talking about my sexual preferences is one way of demonstrating that the left-wing is not as desirable as some left-wingers believe it to be. I appreciate that one voice does not make a huge difference, and I also appreciate that my one voice is being drowned out by the thousands of voices that control the ABC, Fairfax, the Public Service, and University newspapers around Australia. That said, sponsoring a third-world child doesn't make a huge difference to alleviating global poverty either, yet it is no reason to keep one's hands in one's pockets. All we can do is be true to ourselves. If I can save one man from wasting time with a left-wing sheila, or save one lady from becoming a left-wing sheila, then I can feel like I’ve made a difference.

Start a new thread on the subject if you feel that strongly about it, just be sure to keep it respectful.

 

[stompie]

Scare campaign? What, like terrorists around the corner?

Hahahah.



Except you've failed dismally and only made these accusations you claim appear to represent you and your kind.



And back to the fantasyworld you live in...

As I said in my previous post, your failure to be happy once more proves that you are person that appreciates nothing and always looks on the negative side, thus are a shining example of the left wing. Now lets discontinue our discussion lest you get banned again.

 

[just maybe]

Sex and politics as not the distinct issues as you believe them to be. If you pickup a university newspaper, you will find that the left-wing devotes considerable resources to attacking females that wear mini-shirts, or those females that show any kind of appreciation towards anything. As these females are always being attacked, by default, the obnoxious left-wing woman is left as the ideal that women should aspire to be like, and that men should aspire to attain. As sex is a powerful motivator, the left-wing is thus empowered with a level of desirability that it does not deserve. In turn, this identity assimilates people towards it, as they too want some level of desirability. Once the identity is assimilated, inductees will support any issue that is deemed to be in the interest of the left-wing. Opposing the Greenhouse effect is one of many such issues.

Talking about my sexual preferences is one way of demonstrating that the left-wing is not as desirable as some left-wingers believe it to be. I appreciate that one voice does not make a huge difference, and I also appreciate that my one voice is being drowned out by the thousands of voices that control the ABC, Fairfax, the Public Service, and University newspapers around Australia. That said, sponsoring a third-world child doesn't make a huge difference to alleviating global poverty either, yet it is no reason to keep one's hands in one's pockets. All we can do is be true to ourselves. If I can save one man from wasting time with a left-wing sheila, or save one lady from becoming a left-wing sheila, then I can feel like I’ve made a difference.

You've just made some absolute crap up and used it to slag left-wing chicks.

You have NOTHING to back your argument but your own bitter prejudice.

What a joke.

 

[just maybe]

As I said in my previous post, your failure to be happy once more proves that you are person that appreciates nothing and always looks on the negative side, thus are a shining example of the left wing. Now lets discontinue our discussion lest you get banned again.

What are you talking about? I'm perfectly happy. It is clearly you who are not, with your bitter attacks on the left-wing.

I am just enjoying taking apart your heavily prejudiced arguments. You make it so easy.

 

[stompie]

You've just made some absolute crap up and used it to slag left-wing chicks.

You have NOTHING to back your argument but your own bitter prejudice.

What a joke.

Monkster, you previous posting was sound logic about the need to talk about this issue under a thread title that defines it as the issue being discussed. Unfortunately, Just Maybe has once again made a positing that warrants a response that in no way relates to the topic. I appreciate that responding to Just Maybe is going to continue a discussion that is distinct from the title of this thread.

Even though I appreciate this problem, unfortunately the situation necessitates that I respond to Just Maybe, so I shall respond. As this will not be the first time that a thread had been corrupted and destroyed by Just Maybe, may I suggest that it might be worthwhile considering to ban him in order to ensure topics can remain relatively focussed.

Just Maybe – If you want evidence, go to any university in Australia, pick up their free newspapers and read it. You wil soon note an ideology of denigration towards a specific kind of woman.

 

[just maybe]

Monkster, you previous posting was sound logic about the need to talk about this issue under a thread title that defines it as the issue being discussed. Unfortunately, Just Maybe has once again made a positing that warrants a response that in no way relates to the topic. I appreciate that responding to Just Maybe is going to continue a discussion that is distinct from the title of this thread.

Even though I appreciate this problem, unfortunately the situation necessitates that I respond to Just Maybe, so I shall respond. As this will not be the first time that a thread had been corrupted and destroyed by Just Maybe, may I suggest that it might be worthwhile considering to ban him in order to ensure topics can remain relatively focussed.

Considering you're the one who turned this into a left-wing slag thread, that's not a convincing argument.

Just Maybe – If you want evidence, go to any university in Australia, pick up their free newspapers and read it. You wil soon note an ideology of denigration towards a specific kind of woman.

I've just spent 6 years at uni, my dear. And read the uni newspaper every month. The feminist stuff did not slag off women, it was about empowerment of women to do and wear what they want - and that includes looking sexy and wearing miniskirts.

So yes, you're badly wrong. But that's not surprising, given you're quite old and live in China. One would expect you to be out of the loop.

Bring this back on topic anytime you want!

 

[Monkster]

Congrats guys, you just got the thread locked.