7Cricket Vs Fox Cricket

Who has the better coverage?


  • Total voters
    293

Remove this Banner Ad



Another example where Fox calling from the studio doesn’t recognise there is a runout chance until it’s shown on the screen. From watching on 7, they said runout chance as the ball was thrown.

It’s the Women’s Ashes, if you are already using 7’s graphics and are calling from a studio you might as well take the 7 commentary from the ground.
 
Am i wrong in thinking brad had a burner twitter account or something too? if wrong i apoligise.
Wouldn't be surprising, but you're probably thinking of the piece of shit executive who was finally sacked in October of last year:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I still prefer Fox's test coverage, but there is literally no benefit to Fox's coverage of the BBL when all they do is scream, and they aren't even at the ground.

I don't think the Saturday games mean that much to me... Jan-Feb is starting to open up as a 2 month period where I can save 70 bucks on Kayo.
For me, the play-by-play guys are the most important part of the cricket coverage, and I don’t think 7 has any bad ones that they frequently use (Brayshaw, Mitchell, Lane, Nicholson). In contrast, I despise both Julian, and Howard (though I don’t mind him for the footy)

7 do have more comments guys that are annoying (Langer/Hayden/Copeland), but Ponting mitigates that for me

That’s before I get to Fox not even being at the ground (which applies to both sports)
 
Footy: Fox >> 7
Cricket: 7 >>>>> Fox
I agree. It used to be Fox>7 with cricket too but 7 has overtaken Fox overall with their cricket broadcast.
I still prefer Fox's test coverage, but there is literally no benefit to Fox's coverage of the BBL when all they do is scream, and they aren't even at the ground.

I don't think the Saturday games mean that much to me... Jan-Feb is starting to open up as a 2 month period where I can save 70 bucks on Kayo.
Fox test coverage is only slightly better than 7 (55-45%) and 7’s W/BBL & Women’s Internationals generally better than Fox so 7 is overall better. So I stick with 7 for the cricket. And cancel Kayo during that time.

2025 Fox is the place for AFL, especially Friday nights with Hudson & Wheatley calling while 7 will still probably have BT 🤮 & Brayshaw (who is only slightly better than BT).

That’s before I get to Fox not even being at the ground (which applies to both sports)
With AFL, not being at the ground doesn’t really affect the commentary like it does with cricket. So Fox commentary is not that horrible.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

How much did they pay in getting the rights to the cricket only to cheapskate the product and pretty much ruin it? I mean I hate ads as much as anyone but having commentators with no idea what's going on whenever the ball goes up in the air is just ridiculous
 
Calling from the studio aside, I do find it odd to see people criticise the Fox team for being too Blokey/Triple M in their approach to commentary, but at the same time will talk about how good it was when Channel 10 had the BBL.

In terms of presentation style (once again not talking about the whole calling from the studio thing, which is horrendous), there is very little difference between 10 and Fox.
 
How much did they pay in getting the rights to the cricket only to cheapskate the product and pretty much ruin it?
Reportedly, Fox are paying about $150m per year under the current deal (which goes through to the end of the 2030-31 season). Seven are paying $65m per year.
 
Calling from the studio aside, I do find it odd to see people criticise the Fox team for being too Blokey/Triple M in their approach to commentary, but at the same time will talk about how good it was when Channel 10 had the BBL.

In terms of presentation style (once again not talking about the whole calling from the studio thing, which is horrendous), there is very little difference between 10 and Fox.
Except the producer...

The old Channel 10 producer went to Seven, and the old Channel 9 producer (Brad McNamara) went to Fox.
 
Calling from the studio aside, I do find it odd to see people criticise the Fox team for being too Blokey/Triple M in their approach to commentary, but at the same time will talk about how good it was when Channel 10 had the BBL.

In terms of presentation style (once again not talking about the whole calling from the studio thing, which is horrendous), there is very little difference between 10 and Fox.
one can argue, it was a bit more of a novelty when ch10 had the rights. Plus you need the right people/personalities to pull it off without complaints.
 
Ch7 have raised their game with their Big Bash coverage with much better quality commentators plus they are at all games live.

In previous years they had Jason Richardson, Andy Maher and Lisa Sthalekar commenting the BBL and they are WBBL standard.

It looks like they will be raising their game with their AFL coverage too, they have a new head of sport who has brought a broom.
 
How much did they pay in getting the rights to the cricket only to cheapskate the product and pretty much ruin it? I mean I hate ads as much as anyone but having commentators with no idea what's going on whenever the ball goes up in the air is just ridiculous
7 is paying less than what they paid when they first got the cricket (with a clause of paying more if conditions are met) the deal is more than before so it was all Fox paying more compared to 7
 
Apparently neither company have picked up the rights for the Sri Lanka tour and we won’t have any where to watch it but listening to it via abc
 

7Cricket Vs Fox Cricket


Write your reply...
Back
Top