Agree, he's out of form, overthinking every ball/shotSmith has copped a lot of criticism over the past few months but somehow Labuschagne has somehow avoided it. He’s been pretty bad now for a prolonged period at number 3.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agree, he's out of form, overthinking every ball/shotSmith has copped a lot of criticism over the past few months but somehow Labuschagne has somehow avoided it. He’s been pretty bad now for a prolonged period at number 3.
Travis Head.Serious questions need to be asked about the Australian batting. Labuschagne should be on notice.
You’d think the “best test team ever” would know thatbowling top of off stump to a #11
what a novel idea!
As much as the Windies played great cricket Australia at their best hammer them. Windies played great, elite level cricket while Australia were arrogant starting from team selection (even with Smith and Green our best) and pervaded through the side with their attitude.Anyone going on about this being an embarrassing loss needs to appreciate what the Windies have done here.
This is about them. They played legitimately elite level cricket.
That's a bold call. There was a bloke called Bradman who was supposed to have been pretty good.Smith was in and is the best batsman in history.
At very least against S JosephSmith was in and is the best batsman in history. He didn’t take responsibility to farm the strike and win the game until the last wicket. It’s definitely on him
Bingo. Can't be perfect, and literally carried bat with wickets dropping left, right, and centre lol.
England are the real moral winners out of this match. They would have beaten the Windies with their eyes closedWe're moral victors though coz we retained the Wank Worrell trophy?
On SM-S908E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Ah huh, you’re talking about the same Starc with 350 Test wickets, yeah?Yeah, but can he bowl pies down leg regularly? Advantage, Starc!
Leach is bowling now.Leach injured I think
Stokes played an amazing innings but I think people also forget there was a lot of luck that went his way too.You're right. Smudge should have possessed the spirit of Stokes and played a game style that is completely the antithesis to his own style, right there on the pitch.
Stokes and Smudge are both amazing batsmen - but they are worlds apart in terms of how they influence a game. Smudge does not have the insane power or mental willpower of what will probably be one of the greatest finishers the game has seen.
Smudge tried bloody hard, held his bat the entire innings, but he ran out of partners. He played more than his part and tried to farm the strike as best as possible.
I question why an opener needs 9 partners to chase a total of 200?
One match finishing at about 4am local time is unlikely to register on most people's radar at all, unfortunately.I hope this restores some joy towards Test cricket in the Caribbean
Joseph a bit expensive in that spell, too.West Indies can't even take a game to the 5th day.