- Nov 14, 2010
- 46,874
- 54,220
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Pick 44 would have to be the max
And even with that it should come with some steak knives our way
And even with that it should come with some steak knives our way
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Black swan too greedyPick 44 would have to be the max
And even with that it should come with some steak knives our way
I'm all for incentives, but giving him the B&F before he's played a game is a bridge too far imoHopefully, our plan to hand him the B&F ahead of X and Sheez to convince him to stay hasn't backfired
NthF3+NthF4>SwansSo what do we think it will take to get this trade finalized?
F3?
They would have bitten Brady's hand off to lock that in before Vodd found out.If we had offered anything with our R2 pick Sydney would have already accepted it.
Yeah they might use lube on us this year..You'd think Sydney would take it easy on us after last year.
Glad we are getting back to being innovatorsI'm all for incentives, but giving him the B&F before he's played a game is a bridge too far imo
Big stitch up if so. Kills our chances of Gerryn or Hannaford.I’ve heard we will be offering our 2nd round pick in the 20’s & get a 4th rounder back with Parker .
I’ve got a good mate who works for an opposition club that’s ITK.
Agree not happy with this outcome if it eventuates at all. Sydney are crap to deal with at the best of times but this would be ridiculous.Big stitch up if so. Kills our chances of Gerryn or Hannaford.
Because he isn't very goodNot sure if this has been mentioned b4 but I see Josh Fahey is in limbo without a contract. I vaguely remember reading we maybe into him this trade period. Left footer who can play HB/wing. Has some dash. Has anyone heard anything? Would be a good get imo.
PMBangers any idea why he hasn’t be offered a contract at GWS?
Ouch! Ok we will passBecause he isn't very good
"Talks opened between Sydney and North on Tuesday around Luke Parker. The Swans knocked back the initial Kangas offer of pick 62. They want something greater than pick 62."
How can we get pick 61?"Talks opened between Sydney and North on Tuesday around Luke Parker. The Swans knocked back the initial Kangas offer of pick 62. They want something greater than pick 62."
I think they misjudged how the fan base would take it, and thought it'd be more like Darling out of WCE
"Talks opened between Sydney and North on Tuesday around Luke Parker. The Swans knocked back the initial Kangas offer of pick 62. They want something greater than pick 62."
43 gets it done. We just had to put in the ambit claim of 62 to disabuse them of the notion that 25 is ever going to be on the table.To be fair, I don't blame them. That's a pretty silly offer for a player who is still contracted and still at the higher end than lower.
Or next year’s third rounder43 gets it done. We just had to put in the ambit claim of 62 to disabuse them of the notion that 25 is ever going to be on the table.