NFL 2025 Pre-Draft Discussion

[aussiedude]

NFL Draft order

01. Tennessee
02. Cleveland
03. New York Giants
04. New England
05. Jacksonville
06. Las Vegas
07. New York Jets
08. Carolina
09. New Orleans
10. Chicago
11. San Francisco
12. Dallas
13. Miami
14. Indianapolis
15. Atlanta
16. Arizona
17. Cincinnati
18. Seattle
19. Tampa Bay
20. Denver
21. Pittsburgh
22. Los Angeles Chargers
23. Green Bay
24. Minnesota
25. Houston
26. Los Angeles Rams
27. Baltimore
28. Detroit
29. Washington
30. Buffalo
31. Kansas City
32. Philadelphia

 

[Toadvine]

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Ive heard there are also issues with Luther Burden. So many dickheads or worse in college that teams cover up for.

 

[Toadvine]

Ive heard there are also issues with Luther Burden. So many dickheads or worse in college that teams cover up for.

So he's a future Chief, Steeler or Bengal I guess?

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

So he's a future Chief, Steeler or Bengal I guess?

“He’s a 5-star, they kissed his ass for three years just to keep him there,” another scout said. “The girlfriend is his manager. The mom is a problem. But he’s a good player on Saturday and he’s very ordinary Monday through Friday. That’s an area he’s really going to have to improve. I thought his tape from 2023 was better than 2024 but I also thought the quarterback play was a little better a year ago. If you take him you’re gritting your teeth that you’re going to have a (Sunday) player who isn’t going to add much to your team the other five, six days of the week. He’s a shaky first-rounder and a little more of a second-rounder because you can’t get anybody to really sign off on a clean bill of health as far as the personality and the intangibles.”

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

Screams Steeler reading that Toad

 

[Toadvine]

 

[drd23]

 

[aussiedude]

He is going to be this years player who has to wait till day 2 and they keep showing him on TV.

I dont think i would even give him a day 2 grade.

 

[drd23]

 

[Constantgin]

Has there ever been a more stupid idea. Trade a top 5 rb cos your going to running back by committee to use a top 7 pick on a rb.

 

[Exe Gesis]

I've been thinking for weeks now that the Giants take Jeanty at #3....due to backlash and mistake of getting rid of Barkley, so they will look to fix that mistake. Jeanty is a top tier talent so not like a reach. But i want to put some money on it but I'm permanently banned on Sportsbet all of a sudden (recent weeks). Called them and they said managerial discretion, wont disclose reasoning....but i figure it's because i often do chandelier-swinging multis that would fetch 100k or soif they happen, abd theyre afraid i might pop one i guess.

 

[aussiedude]

Has there ever been a more stupid idea. Trade a top 5 rb cos your going to running back by committee to use a top 7 pick on a rb.

They dont have the OL for that. and Fields at QB means it will be a run first team. might be a option system. but like i said the OL isnt good enough

 

[A11dAtP0w3R]

I've been thinking for weeks now that the Giants take Jeanty at #3....due to backlash and mistake of getting rid of Barkley, so they will look to fix that mistake. Jeanty is a top tier talent so not like a reach. But i want to put some money on it but I'm permanently banned on Sportsbet all of a sudden (recent weeks). Called them and they said managerial discretion, wont disclose reasoning....but i figure it's because i often do chandelier-swinging multis that would fetch 100k or soif they happen, abd theyre afraid i might pop one i guess.

Never heard of that being a reason but maybe IDK... you sure you havent done anything dodgy?

 

[Exe Gesis]

Never heard of that being a reason but maybe IDK... you sure you havent done anything dodgy?

The law gives them the right to use that term managerial discretion to ban anyone they see fit as a threat ro them or their profitability. They wouldn't tell me the reason, and reserve the legal right to not give a reason, but looking at all the possible reasons gpchat gave me (in depth rundown of it and australian law), the only thing i could see as a reason was my betting behavior. And i have no legal avenue or fair trading type dispute resolution to reverse it. Only of I still had funds or winnings and them refusing to pay it out after banning me....that is the only thing I could realistically fight for....but i have no funds being withheld

 

[Exe Gesis]

I still have a TAB acct and i recently created a Dabble acct. Someone told me theyre good. They also told me many people are abandoning Sportsbet because of how often they ban people for winnings or cases like mine.

Anyway, neither dabble or tab have a market yet for the draft, but look forward to putting a little wager on Jenaty to the Giants (tho i will probably be wrong....just a strong hunch)

 

[AJ_2000]

'Sometimes the stats don't tell the whole story': How NFL teams debate potential vs. production

Shemar Stewart has great traits and plenty of upside. But he also had 4.5 sacks in three seasons, making him a tough draft evaluation.

www.espn.com.au

Production vs potential.... Stewart is a fascinating case where he's going in the first round but I've seen mocks as high as 8 to as low as the end of the round.

 

[00Stinger]

I still have a TAB acct and i recently created a Dabble acct. Someone told me theyre good. They also told me many people are abandoning Sportsbet because of how often they ban people for winnings or cases like mine.

Anyway, neither dabble or tab have a market yet for the draft, but look forward to putting a little wager on Jenaty to the Giants (tho i will probably be wrong....just a strong hunch)

Sportsbet have restricted my account because I started doing well.

Their loss, now TAB get my $500 I had on Melbourne to finish top 8 at $3

Cash out option is like $27. I probably should just take it

 

[00Stinger]

Going to be interesting to see where Sanders finished up.

9 at New Orleans?

 

[Exe Gesis]

Going to be interesting to see where Sanders finished up.

9 at New Orleans?

Hes gotta go #2 to Browns, surely? all they uave is Pickett.

 

[aussiedude]

Hes gotta go #2 to Browns, surely? all they uave is Pickett.

They are dumb enough to do it.

 

[00Stinger]

Hes gotta go #2 to Browns, surely? all they uave is Pickett.

Nah they will go with Cousins at qb I reckon

Take Abdul Carter at 2

 

[AJ_2000]

The draft is going to be all over the place. Very few players that have a great profile, and performance to back it up.

Its a great year if you're drafting Defensive for a 3-4 system as there's few top prospects from a 4-3 point of view.

 

[WAbulldog]

Nah they will go with Cousins at qb I reckon

Take Abdul Carter at 2

I honestly forgot about Cousins, wouldn’t be a bad option for them.

 

[Constantgin]

Why ?

 

[rumply]

The law gives them the right to use that term managerial discretion to ban anyone they see fit as a threat ro them or their profitability. They wouldn't tell me the reason, and reserve the legal right to not give a reason, but looking at all the possible reasons gpchat gave me (in depth rundown of it and australian law), the only thing i could see as a reason was my betting behavior. And i have no legal avenue or fair trading type dispute resolution to reverse it. Only of I still had funds or winnings and them refusing to pay it out after banning me....that is the only thing I could realistically fight for....but i have no funds being withheld

All corporate bookmakers are pissweak little bitches. I got banned years back after a wild run one drunken Saturday afternoon/evening. I refuse to have anything to do with any of them just on principal.