Again, from my perspective, any manipulation is manipulation. Whether someone steals a Camry or a Lamborghini, it's all theft.
NFL 2025 Pre-Draft Discussion
- Thread starter Exe Gesis
- Start date
- Tagged users None
A11dAtP0w3R
Dumpster Fire Diver
- Oct 18, 2013
- 96,383
- 142,097
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers
A11dAtP0w3R
Dumpster Fire Diver
- Oct 18, 2013
- 96,383
- 142,097
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers
I really like both Henderson and Judkins. Think they can both be quality NFL RBs.
Constantgin
Norm Smith Medallist
It's a really good draft for running backs.
Constantgin
Norm Smith Medallist
This is way I look at this draft class
Not a lot of really top end talent guaranteed stars. Alot of good to great players and lots of depth at certain positions
How I'd rate the class by position
QB - Really bad - Hardly any top talent other than ward and not alot of depth at position plus alot of ? about prospects.
RB - Really Great - Got heaps of top end talent and plenty of depth. Real strength of draft on offense.
WR - Good - No top end talent like Jamar chase but alot of good prospect and plenty of depth.
TE - Great - Two great prospects and plenty of depth
OT - Good - No Stud OL like alt in this draft but alot of good players and plenty of depth.
OG - Bad - Got a few good OG then drops away not alot of depth.
OC - Really Bad - Worst position in the draft for talent, might not have a c taken in first 4 rounds.
DE - Good - Alot of good players and plenty of depth.
DT - Great - Stud DT in graham and plenty of good players and depth.
LB - Bad - Couple of good players then falls away fast not much depth.
CB - Really Great - Got couple of stud prospects, alot of good players and alot of depth.
S - Really Great - Got a stud in starks and plenty of good players and plenty of depth.
Not a lot of really top end talent guaranteed stars. Alot of good to great players and lots of depth at certain positions
How I'd rate the class by position
QB - Really bad - Hardly any top talent other than ward and not alot of depth at position plus alot of ? about prospects.
RB - Really Great - Got heaps of top end talent and plenty of depth. Real strength of draft on offense.
WR - Good - No top end talent like Jamar chase but alot of good prospect and plenty of depth.
TE - Great - Two great prospects and plenty of depth
OT - Good - No Stud OL like alt in this draft but alot of good players and plenty of depth.
OG - Bad - Got a few good OG then drops away not alot of depth.
OC - Really Bad - Worst position in the draft for talent, might not have a c taken in first 4 rounds.
DE - Good - Alot of good players and plenty of depth.
DT - Great - Stud DT in graham and plenty of good players and depth.
LB - Bad - Couple of good players then falls away fast not much depth.
CB - Really Great - Got couple of stud prospects, alot of good players and alot of depth.
S - Really Great - Got a stud in starks and plenty of good players and plenty of depth.
A11dAtP0w3R
Dumpster Fire Diver
- Oct 18, 2013
- 96,383
- 142,097
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers
Agree with most but I think the WR is bad. Ive got some serious question marks on the guys who are projected to go round 1, never a good sign. Likely a good one or two comes out of the class but I think a lot will come down to landing spot, no real bomb proof WRs like most other years.
- Feb 28, 2009
- 37,866
- 35,139
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Baltimore Ravens, Atletico
Constantgin
Norm Smith Medallist
I think Mcmillian (higher on him than most), bolden, egbuka (if used mainly slot), Bond, golden, ayomanor and lacy could end up being very good receivers.
But your right no sure fire bonfires stud receivers in this draft doesn’t help last years class was so good.
But alot of good players but your right alot of it will do with scheme and fit and opportunity. Guess I just have abit more faith in this class.
Brasher
Premium Platinum
And it's going to be a generational thing in a few years time
manureid
Laziest Poster on Figbooty
No way they take him surely. I hope they do though
aussiedude
Pac-12 After Dark 2014-2023
- Feb 7, 2010
- 45,699
- 40,536
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Green Bay Packers, Stanford
- Moderator
- #165
DT and RB are deep this year.
Constantgin
Norm Smith Medallist
Safety and corner are pretty deep to this year.
aussiedude
Pac-12 After Dark 2014-2023
- Feb 7, 2010
- 45,699
- 40,536
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Green Bay Packers, Stanford
- Moderator
- #167
Always are. doesnt really look much different to most years.
Some will fly up boards after the combine/pro days.
Its a weak class because of the WR, OL, QB and LB pools. Other then QB there is some quality there but not deep and more project players especially OL and LB
Constantgin
Norm Smith Medallist
I don’t mind OTs in this draft it’s the interior oline especially center is really bad. Atleast guard has a few good prospect , centers have none that I would want to start.
aussiedude
Pac-12 After Dark 2014-2023
- Feb 7, 2010
- 45,699
- 40,536
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Green Bay Packers, Stanford
- Moderator
- #170
I think most teams rate players that can play inside or outside now. the OL flexibility is huge with so many injuries
