Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I can see Jobe3votes team for round 1 being the based off the highest scoring players in round 4 of the NAB lol.
Byrnes v Knights
bothByrnes v Knights
Byrnes is putting a big doubt in my mind....done close to nothing so far.
Then again Knights hasn't played last 2 NAB cup games....so what is the deal there?
Don't like either at this stage.
And I think my point of Zorko v Martin as a stupid question has been justified.
And I think my point of Zorko v Martin as a stupid question has been justified.
Martin once again showing no heart to hunt the ball get involved in the play and lay tackles..
Youre really trying to be an antagonist arent youSo you most certainly wouldnt be picking Gaz or Swan then?
This is the x v y thread...No it hasn't. Martin has a shocker and yes it is very concerning but that doesn't mean it wasn't a valid question. I really don't get how you don't understand that. Plus, part of the reason you think it is not a valid comparison is because they are different prices which is just wrong.
In your opinion Zorko is a far better selection because Martin isn't good enough defensively to put up big enough scores. You believe Zorko is also worth spending the extra 60k on. Why not just say that?
Youre really trying to be an antagonist arent you
No because Swan and GAJ have shown they can score
Dusty has shown he has no heart or drive and this continued in this NAB
They're completely irrelevant
This is the x v y thread...
Martin vs Wright would have been a justifiable quesiton but Zorko is clearly better everything backs that up
If he wanted to know whether it was worth the extra 60k it depends how you spend it so bring an extra duo in for evaluation but HE DIDNT
So its not a valid question... geesus
Yeah well bring the other duo in to make it a comparisonYou can compare everyone IMO
Its all about value and bang for buck outside of captaincy
This is the x v y thread...
Martin vs Wright would have been a justifiable quesiton but Zorko is clearly better everything backs that up
If he wanted to know whether it was worth the extra 60k it depends how you spend it so bring an extra duo in for evaluation but HE DIDNT
So its not a valid question... geesus
No he has not....
When has he averaged over 90??
Oh thats right NEVER
Even without the money, it doesn't matter. Both Zorko and Martin have question marks over there head. Many people on here aren't willing to pick Zorko and for good reasons.
If Martin came out firing today and pumped out a big score would that have made the question justifiable? because if him stinking it up today is enough to justify your claims then him having a big day must mean the opposite?
No he has not....
When has he averaged over 90??
Oh thats right NEVER
Yeah well bring the other duo in to make it a comparison
Jaeger v Fyfe is not a fair evaluation
But Jaeger & Robinson vs Fyfe & Ben Kennedy
is a fair evaluation
That 60k means a lot
No no, in the same way that a bad score from Swan doesnt change his history, a good score from Martin doesnt change his history...
And I think my point of Zorko v Martin as a stupid question has been justified.
You seem to really have a problem with me
I havent got zorko ive already got enough premiumsHes priced at 84 why does he need to have avg over 90 before hes avg 89-90 in 2011.
Ablett has avg 124 before but yes hes priced at 124
Swan has avg 133 before, but yes hes priced at 133
All relative you see
There musnt be enough cap for you to fit in 22 90+avg players
Hows Zorko going for you? plenty of midfield time like Martin?
There you go thats all that was needed to be said from the start. Not that its a stupid comparison. Even you have now answered it which shows it be a fair comparison.I havent got zorko ive already got enough premiums
But id take zorko over martin even with the 60 k every day
Okay I'm going to ask a question to get us back on topic.