As MM used to say - you treat star players differently ( alluding to Swans transgressions) and give them more latitude - Ginnivan was not a star or ever likely to be the full package, so there was no latitude.
How many teams share GMHBA with Geel?
Their historical wins rate is over 80%, with closer to 8/9 in a season than 6/9 this year.
If we had an 80% win rate at MCG as a sole tenant, you’d have a point, but sadly we don’t.
I used those dates because it coincides with when we both peaked with flags. So tracking progress when lists are comparable, to then assess success and list management, seemed sensible.
Not sure I can agree their recruiting is miles ahead - we had the Hine debate months ago in this context. Recency bias with Dempsey and Humphries, is not enough in my view.
We even discussed their kids in the Hine debate and their kids are not miles ahead or ours.
Agree Scott underperformed when...
Can’t agree - they are peripheral to the longevity to his success - excellent player manager, tactician and game day Coach.
And I actually don’t really like the bloke, but nonetheless respect him.
But massive HGA helps his record.
Same number of flags between 2010-2023.
They have a win rate at GMHBA over 80% which gives them a walk up start to finals every year.
We won a flag based on great recruitment which was lauded.
For me they one have ONE insurmountable advantage which is nonetheless irksome - Scott has proven to...
Your lament is illogical- for every Dear there are at least 10 misses, and worse at pick 56.
The draft is a lottery and to pretend you can guarantee a successful pick especially at Dear’s pick 57 is folly, let alone complain there are lessons to be learnt.
Don’t know how Rozee and Butters keep getting found out when the pressure is on.
For me it’s probably body size - can’t compete against bodies like Danger. JHF has the size but can’t do it alone.
I think it’s way too premature to write Dean off, given how much injury has impaired his progress.
He’s shown improvement and his 17 marks in one game clearly shows we have something to work with.
I keep saying this resonates like the delist calls on Murphy in 2021.
How did he have 17 marks in his last game without awareness IQ, or athleticism?
He was considered a great interceptor and reader of the play, in his last VFL season.
I think Grundy is an interesting example. He’s superfluous and unsuited to our game style but valued in the Swan system.
So projecting future game style changes is a different variable all together.
Which basically means that there is no option but to build a competitive style based on the...
As to the dual sided example I used - I qualified it by saying “all things being equal”, because you’re right otherwise the other peripheral variables will confound the choice.
There’s no such thing as perfect system but refining a systems and continuous improvement must always be the goal...
Read a great book a few year ago “The Numbers Game” entirely about how data was driving the EPL.
An amazing example was data that existed for strikers where their resilience was benchmarked.
You could pick the downhill skier ( with a propensity to score once their team was ahead) from those with...
There would have to be an existing system of metrics.
Leppa is likely to add or subtract criteria, so I’m not not sure it’s that hard.
For example a player fluent on both sides ( all other criteria being equal) would rate higher than a one sided player. Similarly speed.
And the list would go on.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.