- Banned
- #351
Another apt Demons description, probably breaks down straight out the gateWe wouldn't lower ourselves to compare our glorious, friendly personalities with power tools.
Vintage Bentleys on the other hand......
View attachment 1976821
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 7
SuperCoach Rd 7 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 7 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Another apt Demons description, probably breaks down straight out the gateWe wouldn't lower ourselves to compare our glorious, friendly personalities with power tools.
Vintage Bentleys on the other hand......
View attachment 1976821
Impeccable motor.Another apt Demons description, probably breaks down straight out the gate
Don't care.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think it this case it would just be Bay.Don't care.
Check 'em out at Bay to Birdwood.
The only issue I have with this is they've left off Alfa Romeo, probably because they thought it was a statistical anomaly.Dead last.
View attachment 1976850
I guess the "bent" part of the name is for the owners that get bent overDead last.
View attachment 1976850

Willn’t you think of non-English speakers Legs? How ever will they get to the bottom of this contraction contradiction?Won't sounds better than willn't. Willin't sounds weird.
You reckon we put a teamsheet in today? Or nah?Another satisfied pair of customers
View attachment 1976890
With the talent we have available it would be criminal not to mangYou reckon we put a teamsheet in today? Or nah?
They just need to accept that English is a dumb language that operates on vibesWilln’t you think of non-English speakers Legs? How ever will they get to the bottom of this contraction contradiction?
I guess when you realise it's created by the same people that created British cuisine it makes a fair bit of senseThey just need to accept that English is a dumb language that operates on vibes
Blame the 12th century Brits (such as Chipmunk) who decided to split the verb "willan" (which meant to wish or will) into two forms: "wil" for the present tense and "wold" for the past tense.Willn’t you think of non-English speakers Legs? How ever will they get to the bottom of this contraction contradiction?
Blame the 12th century Brits (such as Chipmunk) who decided to split the verb "willan" (which meant to wish or will) into two forms: "wil" for the present tense and "wold" for the past tense.
"wil" then evolved further, to "wool" to "wel" to "woll" (typical British indecisiveness), before finally coming to a consensus in the 16th century when "woll" became "will", and "wold" became our "would" .
"Won't" is a legacy from when the verb was "woll", as it is short for "woll not".
With the talent we have available it would be criminal not to mang
So you just have to ask yourself.
Are you a criminal?
You know what to do, or not do then
![]()
Blame the 12th century Brits (such as Chipmunk) who decided to split the verb "willan" (which meant to wish or will) into two forms: "wil" for the present tense and "wold" for the past tense.
"wil" then evolved further, to "wool" to "wel" to "woll" (typical British indecisiveness), before finally coming to a consensus in the 16th century when "woll" became "will", and "wold" became our "would" .
"Won't" is a legacy from when the verb was "woll", as it is short for "woll not".
I agree with this tooThey just need to accept that English is a dumb language that operates on vibes











