Mystery Who really wrote the works of Shakespeare? Or, the Shakespeare authorship question...

Remove this Banner Ad

The Final Piece in the Puzzle - A book of poetry published under her own name.
This is the final piece of evidence we have to uncover the identity of Emilia Bassano; an extraordinary book of original verse published under her own name, late in her career; “Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum”. It was the first book of original verse by an English woman published to derive an income through sales and patronage.
On the surface it pretends to be a religious work but is in fact a highly subversive parody; a radical reinterpretation of the crucifixion story from a woman’s point of view. It includes such heresies as the denial of ‘original sin’ and Eve’s guilt, and treats the gospels as having no divine authority, so that she is free to change and invent characters and content, just as the Shakespeare works treat other literary sources.
Her book of verse, despite being a different literary form, is replete with common characteristics to the Shakespeare plays – characteristics rarely found in any other literature of the time. These include: Feminist themes, Intelligent complex women who resist societal restrictions, The same unique language and rare words, They draw on the same extensive list of literary sources, The most common references in her book of verse come from the Shakespeare works, Both works are highly experimental and innovative in their use of dramatic devices, Both works referenced the virtually unknown feminist writings of Catherine De Pizan, who is not referenced in any other literature of the time. These are just a few examples.
These commonalities with the plays, especially the late plays written about the same time, are so significant and unique to each other, that it is likely that they are by the same author, making Emilia Bassano the likely author of both works.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I'd think the most likely version of events is that Shakespeare and Emilia knew one another. The speculation that they were somehow intimately involved is the more likely version than her actually having written it all.
If she was associated with Marlowe then he definitely knew her and like Rick Springfield loved her from afar.

Now for azlou to name check on all of the characters
 
Thats very interesting but can we simultaneously say she was a published writer and also say she wrote stuff under the name shakespeare because 'women weren't allowed to"?

Also interesting is the animosity between the 'pro and 'anti' factions. but its largely the anti stratfordians who have very selective evidence, but you cant let disdain for them prevent you from being objective

So the plays appeal to women - would not the audience have been significantly women. Can we not imagine that plays were a living thing which increasingly explored concepts which appeal to females, once this became apparent? we say there are rules but popular culture of our time loves to flout the rules too?
 
Did George Harrison write "while my guitar gently weeps' or did Clapton have significant input (to the riff)

We know exactly how much now, but in 250 years time it will be Harrisons name alone on the track. Its not important right now, we just enjoy it for what it is.
I'm suggesting authorship was of minor consequence when the phenomenon which was Shakespeares theatre produced all this fine work

We wont even mention the other four beatles
 
What we do know is that Emilia Bassano was a daughter of an Italian, possibly Moroccan, Jewish musician, brought out to England with his four brothers by King Henry VIII, to form his court recorder consort.
We also know that after age seven and the death of her father, she was raised by the dowager Countess Susan Bertie who gave her a classical humanist education which included early feminist teachings and the works of Catherine De Pizan.
 
We don't think a humble man like Shakespeare is capable of genius because......?

Its unlikely? there was only one Shakespeare, so the chances of it happening were slim. Doesnt mean it cant happen even if its just the once.

We know he didn't live in a time where authorship was strictly codified, more likely wasn't seen as important. Indeed the attempt to do so was after his death and may have been done for various motivations.
Surely if it was one author, that was the time to 'fess up?

The Emilia one makes you think though.
 

Wow. 2008. Something from an actual scholar which sounds much more believable than the other shakesperian candidates

I cant help wondering why the Loudest antagonists, Rylance and Jacobi persist with less believable options even recently - if you do a google search.

Maybe why that's why they sound a bit like evangelists (and their tricks) when arguing their case. Why have they glossed over Emilia?
 
I thought of another contemporary equivalent

Apple are a great innovator, producing great products - but in the main they have re-packaged ideas and concepts which were thought up elsewhere - muich better than those places which conceived them.
No doubt as apple consumers can be a little evangelistic themselves (the industry itself actually uses the word as an occupation) you would get similar arguments in future.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top