Rookie Draft Pick 75: Clancee Pearce

[Lach72]

Welcome back Clancee

 

[freo1]

Re: Rookie Draft Pick 75.

Yaaaay for Clanceeeeee

 

[valkorum]

Re: Rookie Draft Pick 75.

Clanceeeeeeeeeeee

 

[Nickos66]

Re: Rookie Draft Pick 75.

yaaaaayy

 

[Kickett Punches Read]

sigh. dont know why we are bothering with this guy again. will never make it at afl level, would have been better off with another raw KPP imo

 

[Beeawwb_SP]

Welcome back Clancee

 

[Seppo]

A hair cut you can set your clock to.

 

[Clay Davis]

would have been better off with another raw KPP imo

Another?

 

[Kickett Punches Read]

Another?

was referring to our picks in shepherd and sibosado from yesteryear rather than what we have selected in the last 2. but i wasnt very clear about that

 

[JunglistPosse]

Brian Taylor breathes a sigh of relief.

 

[Clay Davis]

was referring to our picks in shepherd and sibosado from yesteryear rather than what we have selected in the last 2. but i wasnt very clear about that

That's a long time ago now, and neither are there any more.

A tall at any point would have been nice. Wishing we took one with our last pick in the rookie draft is pointless. It's obvious that we don't need them.

 

[mr_renniks]

pick 75: Clanceeee pearce, in the white shorts!

 

[WWSD]

Clad he got re-drafted. Talented player. Dawson, Pearce Spurr. Fremantle has strengthened its depth even further. Spurr will play some games next year.

 

[Admiral Byng]

sigh. dont know why we are bothering with this guy again. will never make it at afl level, would have been better off with another raw KPP imo

He is a known quantity. I think you're a bit harsh, I think he is a good choice for a depth player in case of long term injury.

 

[willoblue]

would of preferred a gamble on Manson or at least another "tall".
i hope he proves me wrong, but i just don't think that he will ever be up to AFL standard.

 

[Nickos66]

Probably one of Bolger/Nelson/Hutchings would have been of more value but the coaches obviously thought he earnt his spot so good on him.

 

[Freo4life]

A hair cut you can set your watch to.

Bit pedantic but kudos anyhow

 

[yakamoto]

Why would you draft a player for depth if he has no known role? Don't rate him at all but will be happy to reassess in 12 months.

 

[Chops_a_must]

Why would you draft a player for depth if he has no known role?

Why would you sign a player for 2 years if he has no known role?

 

[Seppo]

Why would you draft a player for depth if he has no known role? Don't rate him at all but will be happy to reassess in 12 months.

MJ got a contract extension to continue playing his 'designated pointer' role.

 

[The Night Shift]

Leave Clancee alone!!!!

 

[Nickos66]

MJ got a contract extension to continue playing his 'designated pointer' role.

Pretty sure that was implied by this post..

Why would you sign a player for 2 years if he has no known role?

 

[apuchar]

Would have gotten rid of Van Berlo before Clancee any day of the week.

 

[Avid_Avenger]

Would have gotten rid of Van Berlo before Clancee any day of the week.

Completely agree. JVB needs to improve in a massive way (skills, decision making, input, speed) to remain ahead of him considering Clancee has reduced his only real negative.

Both will never be superstars (and probably not best 22 either) but a fitter, stronger, more agile Clancee provides better depth in a number of positions

 

[apuchar]

Completely agree. JVB needs to improve in a massive way (skills, decision making, input, speed) to remain ahead of him considering Clancee has reduced his only real negative.

Both will never be superstars (and probably not best 22 either) but a fitter, stronger, more agile Clancee provides better depth in a number of positions

All of the above and his consistency between games. Found it very hard to handle one good game consistently followed by a poor game. (Guess that makes him consistently inconsistent )