- Moderator
- #126
But its just an example of where stuff has probably been destroyed, one which a lot of people dont challenge.
Anne Boleyn's contemporary portraitures? "Probably"? How probably? On what basis can we say probably? Does this evidence stand up to scrutiny? Is there any evidence that such portraiture existed in the first place to be destroyed?
That's my point to you.
All well and good but if you really feel strongly that thye are wrong, seek them out and challenge them, theres lots of them.
I'm not necessarily suggesting they are wrong. I want to know why they think they are right. On what basis do they make such a claim? How reliable is the evidence to back such a claim?
So whats ypur point in relation to the OP ?
I think I answered that in the second post of the thread.