Waiting to see how much the cap goes up.
Lobb is gone though as is daniel if they can find some club silly enough to take on their contracts.
Melb and Adelaide?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Sydney - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 55% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 11
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Waiting to see how much the cap goes up.
Lobb is gone though as is daniel if they can find some club silly enough to take on their contracts.
People are gonna lose their s**t once Bailey Smith is appointed 'Cotton On ambassador' of the GFC aren't they.Money comes from many different avenues these days.
Don't worry about the footballing cash here.
Will earn more outside of it.
People are gonna lose their s**t once Bailey Smith is appointed 'Cotton On ambassador' or the GFC aren't they.
I don't see you ever post anything like this before, so I hope your on the money with this one...Ok Ok here it is.
I don't usually get too involved in whispers and such unless i have something of substance.
I can't devuldge all my sources.
But one today all but confirmed that Western Bulldog Bailey SMITH will be playing in the hoops in 2025.
He has given me pretty good intel over the past decade so i'm happy to post it.
Cheers Boys!!
Yes Hawthorn has some coin to dish out, but we won't be short in having some money to spend as well...With the money hawthorn are throwing at him he would be leaving a lot on the table to come here.
But i know we are keen.
One of his biggest sponsors is Cotton On... And we all know Cotton On links with the club, so you think that's going thats going to help Geelong position as well..I am a bit with u there Turbo.
Wasn't fussed either way we went.
Just heard (and have heard it again) that the powers in the coaches box along with list management viewed him as a priority and that the powerbrokers will facilitate it all.
The bloke who told me is more involved in the latter.
Gonna sit back and watch it play out.
Bit of a paradox though isn't it?They're going to at least demand a haircut I reckon.
The guy has 837 endorsement deals so I reckon he will just choose to play whenever he feels he will get the most enjoyment (on field and off field).With the money hawthorn are throwing at him he would be leaving a lot on the table to come here.
But i know we are keen.
Thats a good point ..and it would be a hint that he is looking for more than just a full pocket.
The guy has 837 endorsement deals so I reckon he will just choose to play whenever he feels he will get the most enjoyment (on field and off field).
He is making bank no matter what.
Hopper was a "locked in" player too so I'll wait till its a done deal before being totally confident that the line has been crossed.
Melb and Adelaide?
Yes Hawthorn has some coin to dish out, but we won't be short in having some money to spend as well...
Not even most players... would be the most of all players and by a long, long way.But that said he makes more from endorsement deals than most players so he might not care about the contract $ as much as some people.
While true, that'll balance out a bit more by the end.See my other post and i agree because of his endorsement deals hes wealthy either way.
But if we offer say 4 x 900 (3.6mil) and hawks offer 1.1 x6 (6.6mil) its still 3mil hes forgoing over the deal..
But i do know we are chasing him hard (which im nervous about but the club knows what its doing).
Not really, because in that case he'd need to work an extra two more years to make that $$$.See my other post and i agree because of his endorsement deals hes wealthy either way.
But if we offer say 4 x 900 (3.6mil) and hawks offer 1.1 x6 (6.6mil) its still 3mil hes forgoing over the deal..
But i do know we are chasing him hard (which im nervous about but the club knows what its doing).
Not really, because in that case he'd need to work an extra two more years to make that $$$.
It's not a same/same comparison.
Yeah true... I guess he is forgoing $$$ but he has the chance to potentially recoup a good amount of it.the point is with the hawks offer he locks in security though. With ours he doesnt know what if anything we will offer him after 2028.
Good points.Bailey Smith. Doesn't defend, poor kick, perfect player to add. With that burst of speed and power he is everything our current crop of mids isn't and can't be trained to do, and our current kids strengths balance his deficiencies perfectly.
There's risk. If he comes back with Jaeger O'Meara knees then it's a failed trade. His poor form over the last couple of years I put down to him being played on a wing where his deficiencies are amplified and sharing contested situations with other contested mids he's supposed to defend for.
The knee could fail the trade, but, the knee also drops the value. I would be more than happy to flush our first and a 4 year contract at decent money on the risk.
As for whether he's coming, I don't want to disrespect anyone claiming inside info but there are two other boards claiming inside info that contradicts.
Yeah I was just throwing out a clusterf*** as a reference point but the risk of him losing the attributes that make him make sense is non-zeroGood points.
Difference with Jaeger though is it was 2 years out, with a patella tendon and ended up with bone on bone bruising too IIRC.
Basically, the attributes that made him look like the next Chris Judd (speed, acceleration, & endurance) were gone.
He just became a once paced mid with okay footskills who needed to be played in bursts to be able to play back-to-back weeks. Not a bad player, but a B-grader at best.
I'm no doctor, but my guess would be 1 year out with an ACL wouldn't restrict Bailey to the same level that Jaeger had with his issues.
Players are coming back from them better than ever these days, where as Jaegers injuries would still be considered a career threatening if it happened today.
Bailey Smith. Doesn't defend, poor kick, perfect player to add. With that burst of speed and power he is everything our current crop of mids isn't and can't be trained to do, and our current kids strengths balance his deficiencies perfectly.
There's risk. If he comes back with Jaeger O'Meara knees then it's a failed trade. His poor form over the last couple of years I put down to him being played on a wing where his deficiencies are amplified and sharing contested situations with other contested mids he's supposed to defend for.
The knee could fail the trade, but, the knee also drops the value. I would be more than happy to flush our first and a 4 year contract at decent money on the risk.
As for whether he's coming, I don't want to disrespect anyone claiming inside info but there are two other boards claiming inside info that contradicts.
To be fair hoppers manager had told us he was coming and he was-until richmond offered him 7 yrs and he changed his mind as we were only offering 5. Thats why henry was forced to wait until late.
I think melb for lobb is logical-they are in the window and have 1-2 years of peak gawn left and no other ruck help-they would risk him.
Or maybe ross given he has coached him before (but i dont think saints are in the window).
Daniel im not sure-adel dont seem an obvious fit and port definitely arent. Not sure where but he will ask for a trade if he keeps staying in the vfl.
We will have the cap space to match a hawks offer no doubt but its just offering huge contracts isnt our go (if it was we would have matched richmonds 7 years as we wanted hopper). I cant see us offering him what hawks will though we can.
No current season stats available
This year is a write-off due to his ACL, but I don't think you can say it was poor, he just never had a chance to get on the ground.I’m genuinely not sure where to land on Smith. Two poor years plus an ACL. But, explosive pace.
So we move him into a Dangerfield type role surrounded by very very good defensive mids? Seems to work.
If it’s a choice between playing for Bevo, Sam Mitchell or Chris Scott then we win that by a mile. I don’t think money will be a driver.
From our side, I’d demand a haircut. Too many players losing headbands for my liking. While I’m at it, cut those sideburns too!
No current season stats available
I think the one thing he doesn't have is sideburns.I’m genuinely not sure where to land on Smith. Two poor years plus an ACL. But, explosive pace.
So we move him into a Dangerfield type role surrounded by very very good defensive mids? Seems to work.
If it’s a choice between playing for Bevo, Sam Mitchell or Chris Scott then we win that by a mile. I don’t think money will be a driver.
From our side, I’d demand a haircut. Too many players losing headbands for my liking. While I’m at it, cut those sideburns too!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com