Where's the "it's complicated" option?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 13
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Thank you . Much appreciatedGreat input. Rich, and compelling.
Who told you this? Stefan Molyneux?
It has been constructed differently over time, and still is.
I was in the San Blas islands recently, and they have three gender identities, with a very distinct and recognized third gender:
Omeggid. San Blas Indigenous Transgenders . Panama by carlo Bevilacqua (visura.co)
View attachment 1306657
Thailand also has a long history with three:
Kathoey - Wikipedia
As for biological sex, there are at least two ethnic groups that have three biological sexes. In the Dominican Republic, and also in PNG, where some girls develop male sexual organs at puberty:
Guevedoce - Wikipedia
It seems as if their societies recognize them as a distinct 'third' sex, but still require them to adopt one gender role (i.e., they are treated as men when they become male at puberty).
Yep, end thread.
Don't know why this is even a thread, just stupid.
Move on everyone.
I would say that if you specifically needed to refer to biology you would, for Darcy and those like them, say "biological female". This seems pretty straightforward. If you're in that position, just check. When will you be in that position though?darcy is female, correct? or woman, or another term. that's darcy's biological sex, right? but calling darcy female is incorrect as darcy identifies as non-binary, despite female being used as a term to describe biological sex, not gender. it's not mis-gendering, it's referring to biological sex. this is all clear as mud.
the problem as i see it is that the terms conflate, even as much as gender/sex might confuse some people. i don't think there's anyone at all who isn't guilty of messing it up in some way. all this tells me is that there's a lot to play out and the rules of engagement as individuals are still being written. lots of terms come with preconceptions.
darcy is female, correct? or woman, or another term. that's darcy's biological sex, right? but calling darcy female is incorrect as darcy identifies as non-binary, despite female being used as a term to describe biological sex, not gender. it's not mis-gendering, it's referring to biological sex. this is all clear as mud.
is it incorrect to say darcy is a non-binary female? i'm catering to both darcy's gender and biological sex in that statement. but the term female (or some other term relating to darcy's biological sex), despite being agreed on as an absolute truth, is not to be mentioned.
as an end note, i'd like to mention that i go back and edit posts where i've used incorrect terms to refer to darcy. i don't care that darcy is non-binary. my interest in any discussion is the rules of any language use, and how rocky the ground is even for those fully on board with darcy. i think they too, conflate language and gender/sex.
I would say that if you specifically needed to refer to biology you would
is it incorrect to say darcy is a non-binary female?
Like full contact competition sport like footy, in the case of Darcy yep she'd have be biologically classified as a female to play (or should be).
And they are. (EDIT)
That's sorted.
Lol I missed the "they".
My bad. I expect to be hounded by TEH SJW C UCKS ANY TIME NOW!
Yes. And I won't. Despite the "yacarnevensayanythinthesedays" crowd.
But they aren't, not really.
I did some searches on TERF
honestly of these progressive groups don’t understand each other, why the brow beating of ‘binary identifying’ groups for not understanding ‘what it’s like to be xxxx’