Samcro24
Cartel Shape Keeper
- Oct 28, 2014
- 10,149
- 25,048
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
The club would never throw a contract at an injury prone midfielder in the twilight of his career, rather than running some kids through there.
List Mgmt. danger - should we be concerned?
- Thread starter xchadders
- Start date
- Tagged users None
As long as the hankies are ok and he can be managed to perform over 15-16 games, he’d be miles more valuable than crouch or Laird. We should be pushing one of those out at end of this year regardless of who might come in.
I'm taking a 28 year old crouch all day over a 34 year old cooked Dangerfield. I agree on Laird, but Crouch has been excellent for us again this year.
call me bitter, but this would be disastrous.
I can't see the young players at our club welcoming Danger. We have a strong, talented, but modest leader in Dawson. THe last thing we need is a FIGJAM to come prancing in, telling everyone how good he is and how things should be done. Patrick is destined for a career in the media (unfortunately), and any suggestions that he'd provide great experience and knowledge in a coaching role (I.e Rucci gushing over the prospect this arvo), are completely off the mark.
Never take back your ex
I can't see the young players at our club welcoming Danger. We have a strong, talented, but modest leader in Dawson. THe last thing we need is a FIGJAM to come prancing in, telling everyone how good he is and how things should be done. Patrick is destined for a career in the media (unfortunately), and any suggestions that he'd provide great experience and knowledge in a coaching role (I.e Rucci gushing over the prospect this arvo), are completely off the mark.
Never take back your ex
If we’re getting their future first round pick as well as Danger, then sure why not 
He started well, but he's reverting to norm now I reckon.
spot on, the last thing we need is someone coming in from a successful program and identifying areas where we could improve.
I'm all for people from successful programs, if they are the right fit. Danger is not the fit for us.
Samcro24
Cartel Shape Keeper
- Oct 28, 2014
- 10,149
- 25,048
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
I’ve just gone to the servo, it’s ******* front page of the paper!
Well, yeah, but it's not a very good paper.
Samcro24
Cartel Shape Keeper
- Oct 28, 2014
- 10,149
- 25,048
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
But it’s our paper
- Dec 29, 2000
- 23,900
- 21,226
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
It is from a discussion way back in January, when club was talking to Connors according to Rowey about free agents.
But how has it got legs 4 months later? Slow news day?
There are a long list of Geelong players current and ex, who I would welcome into the club for this rather than Dangerfield.
I think his skin folds say no.
It's a nothing story - divvy the thread.
- Nov 5, 2009
- 10,308
- 9,699
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Probably the fact he would be weeks away from turning 35 years old when he played for us.
Golumless
A bigger deal out west.
A part of me likes this story line, especially as you could run Dangerfield as a half forward for a year and two and Geelong has been uber successful. Would a Pedlar, Curtin, Soligo, Rachele, Rankine etc benefit from this? Looks a pretty safe yes at this point.
But then again, it's hard to not see this as a bit of a gut-punch if it did happen as Danger leaving was a part of the snowball that led to us losing a grand final and a lost era.
But but then again, if we won a flag with a 35-36yr old Danger??? That seems a dumb enough scenario where it could be plausible.
But then again, it's hard to not see this as a bit of a gut-punch if it did happen as Danger leaving was a part of the snowball that led to us losing a grand final and a lost era.
But but then again, if we won a flag with a 35-36yr old Danger??? That seems a dumb enough scenario where it could be plausible.
Similar threads
