I'm pretty sure the going rate for a KC is about $10,000 a day, at least.Who's paying this guy's bills and why? A twice accused rapist with no income seems to have some pretty pricey legal representation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm pretty sure the going rate for a KC is about $10,000 a day, at least.Who's paying this guy's bills and why? A twice accused rapist with no income seems to have some pretty pricey legal representation.
Could be Kerry Stokes from channel 7 paying as wellI'm pretty sure the going rate for a KC is about $10,000 a day, at least.
Here in South Australia, the accused can elect trial by judge alone. It's considered a good idea when the accused is unpopular or it's (say) rape or child sex abuse.It does raise a question as to how one will get an appropriate jury for the case.
It depends on how well the trial goes. I assume his defence team would have already done the backgrounding, they'll just decide how much they need to go with.How long until we get a front page spread of the victim's entire private life, including phone contents and dental records?
If we find out she lied to her parents about brushing her teeth as a child, how can we trust her on this????
I can already see the headline!
DAMNING NEW FINDINGS PROVES ALLEGED VICTIM A LIAR!
Prosecutor is also corrupt, and ugly.
Janet Albrechtsen.
Sorry but I have to pull you up here.It depends on how well the trial goes. I assume his defence team would have already done the backgrounding, they'll just decide how much they need to go with.
The thing is this case seems fairly weak. Again alcohol involved, it's about the condom as there was a level of consent and it will come down to a he said she said situation. And expect the defence to jump on the fact that she made the complaint after she found out who he is.
Yeah I'm sure she was able to consent to the "surprise sleep sex"it's about the condom as there was a level of consent
Could point, I'm sure that's part of the charges the surprise sleep sex.Yeah I'm sure she was able to consent to the "surprise sleep sex"
I was simply referring the details as we have them. I believe getting the conviction here will be difficult, however not impossible.Sorry but I have to pull you up here.
Saying the 'the case 'is fairly weak' when the trial hasn't even started and none of the evidence has been heard is typical of what happens in the media when it comes to charges of rape involving young women. And it pisses me off.
The credibility of the defendant and the alleged victim is critical to sexual assault cases btw where there is often no physical evidence or independent witnesses of the (alleged) assault.
So how about we just hold off on making BS assessments of whether the evidence is weak and the role played by alcohol and leave that to the Court, eh?
And as to the 'alleged backgrounding', just as in the aborted trial for his alleged rape of Brittany Higgins, the alleged victim here has had her phone forensically analysed as part of the pre-trial processes .
We all know what happened with the private details on Ms Higgins phone - they became front page news in Murdoch papers.
Let's see what happens here.
he is getting a lot of pro bono, both his barristers in the last(? I have lost track) case worked gratis because it was so high profileWho's paying this guy's bills and why? A twice accused rapist with no income seems to have some pretty pricey legal representation.
I'm Richard Branson.I remember being out with a mate in 2005 at a dodgy sports club. We are both in our late teens, and both virgins.
Anyway, it is a Saturday night and we are both aimlessly punching the buttons on a slot machine each. A random women comes up to my mate and sits down next to him in an otherwise empty pokies room. She looks late 20s.
She starts rubbing his leg and pretty much immediately they are tongue kissing - the type of drunken open mouth, deep tongue that you will see in every regional pub/nightclub across the country after midnight on a Friday and Saturday night.
My mate owned a dodgy unit across the road from the sports club and drunkenly asks the chic if she wants to come back with him and off they go.
The next day my mate is on cloud nine. Saying he had sex with her several times during the night before she made a hurried exact for the door at 6 am. My mate asks her if he can see her again to which she responds, "I'm 28 with two kids, probably not".
He then says that he started kissing her while she was asleep and started having sex to which she enthusiastically joined in.
To this day the story makes me feel uneasy.
So you thought you'd pay that feeling forward.To this day the story makes me feel uneasy.
So you thought you'd pay that feeling forward.
Ol' Bryce should probably retire any "surprise sleep sex tactics" as they don't seem to be a real winner with his partners. Also makes it a bit difficult to say you had consent.
I agree. I think the Higgins case has demonstrated how disgustingly Australian society (media, social media, the general public) still handles sex crime cases.
What good comes from constant reporting on a criminal case that hasn't been resolved? Journos will respond: 'Your right to know.' More like their right to make money out of salacious stories that sell papers and get clicks.
You have the right to know jack s**t. Criminal proceedings are very serious matters, and wall-to-wall reporting on sex cases can do nothing to help the administration of justice - it can only harm.
Once someone is found guilty, publish by all means. I don't mean every criminal case should be in closed court (that would compromise open justice), but I think the time has come for at least sex cases to have blanket suppression orders.
I think the whole situation is sketchy as hell and at no point was either party in a position to provide clear consent
if you were compos mentis you probably should have recognised neither was in a position to be making good decisions and intervened