- Sep 6, 2005
- 145,541
- 95,424
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Despite all that, and despite me not believing in aliens, i still feel the whole story and video evidence comes across very credible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think its been discredited after reading ufowatchdog report, tho some things seem off with that too.What's the gist of the story GG?
I'll be interested in your thoughts/feedback. There's stuff about his story that's sus. But there's stuff about the photos/videos that comes off legit. A deep dive into his background/character, people who know him....he got debunked, shown to be a flake....but that could also be them getting told to discredit him and his story. Tho there are things about his story that come off sus.The Reed case is very comprehensive. Thanks for posting that up!
Snowden says aliens (and chem trails) are not legit on the rogan interview.
He apparently had access to the prime databases
Well if not aliens, future human time travellers?
He'll only touch them if they're underage and/or related
It's a con GG, pure and simple. Unfortunately 'Ufology' is full of cons, grifters and nutters. This is very similar in concept to the Ray Santilli alien autopsy film, though that model was vastly better and the production values of the film were good. That model was made by John Humphreys, a well known British sculptor/special effects guy. He's done some well known work in film and video such as Max Headroom and The Humbug Tree in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. He talks a little bit about the autopsy film here; Beyond Reality: interview with maestro John Humphreys - The Hot CornI'll be interested in your thoughts/feedback. There's stuff about his story that's sus. But there's stuff about the photos/videos that comes off legit. A deep dive into his background/character, people who know him....he got debunked, shown to be a flake....but that could also be them getting told to discredit him and his story. Tho there are things about his story that come off sus.
Eg, people say he never owned a dog, hated petting them. Yet there is a photo of him with a dog fitting the description of his supposed dog he owned, petting it. Some aspects of his story, putting creature in a freezer, etc, for a week or so. I dunno man, if i had his experience I'd come right out and announce it to the media, right away, break the whole story open (if it were real). Not hide and collude for a week or so in secret.