Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
There was an agreement between docklands and the state government no stadium about 30k could be builtThey got the size of the stadium wrong or perhaps they simply couldn't go bigger with it? If it could sit 50k it would be more future proof as Melbourne needs a larger rectangular stadium.
Victory pushed for a bigger stadium at the time of building while both rugby codes and Heart (at the time) wanted it smaller. 30,000 was the final compromise.There was an agreement between docklands and the state government no stadium about 30k could be built
How is this stadium 13 years old?
I just went to my first event here (Elton John concert) and the stadium is s**t.
Bird s**t on the seats. The beams for the roof are filthy af (Have they even been washed in 13 years?) - I've never come across such a filthy stadium
The congestion to exit is also deplorable. Does it even reach fire safety standards for evacuation times? The congestion out back 1.5h before the show was terrible.
I guess the acoustics are good, and it's a stunning roof (from the outside). But wow. How the **** did it finish 3rd in (2% behind 1st) for best rectangular stadium in the country. Must've been a public vote and it got a high vote based on bias locals who know no better.
I'd put it on Par with Subiaco and Penrith Stadium. And considering they're both older than me, it's embarrassing how crap AAMI Park is.
There are actually exits via stairs at the Swan St end of the ground (not sure at the other end) but they are very rarely used. I've seen them open a few times after big events but they usually make everyone walk round to the wings.Victory pushed for a bigger stadium at the time of building while both rugby codes and Heart (at the time) wanted it smaller. 30,000 was the final compromise.
As a stadium I quite like AAMI Park. Been quite a few times for soccer and once for a concert and once for rugby league. Really good for the rectangle sports but I thought it was lacking for the concert. Top deck on the Richmond side is lacking food options but it isn't the end of the world. I'm surprised there isn't stairs at either end of the top tier on that side so you could walk up and down instead of being a dead end but I'm sure some stadium designer knows better than me who isn't.
According to Wikipedia, the stadium was built with foundations to allow for future expansion to 50,000, the roof was not designed with this in mind, and so the stadium cannot be expanded without major construction work.They got the size of the stadium wrong or perhaps they simply couldn't go bigger with it? If it could sit 50k it would be more future proof as Melbourne needs a larger rectangular stadium.
For what events? Do any of the tenants fill the ground now?They got the size of the stadium wrong or perhaps they simply couldn't go bigger with it? If it could sit 50k it would be more future proof as Melbourne needs a larger rectangular stadium.
Bigger crowds are catered for at Docklands & these are marque events, not home & away games in the relevant sportsFor what events? Do any of the tenants fill the ground now?
The only way I could see AAMI Park become 50k+ would be IF the Mens FIFA World Cup ever came to AustraliaFor what events? Do any of the tenants fill the ground now?
40k is all you need for a World Cup.In the unlikely World Cup hosting scenario, Melbourne's games would just be at the MCG. The Vic Govt would tip in more for the new Shane Warne Stand than they otherwise would have, and the AFL in return loses access to the ground in winter 2034 for a few months.
Regardless of foundations, they don't have space on 3 sides of AAMI Park to significantly expand it. Do this to the eastern stand and you're still only getting a bit over 40k seats:
View attachment 1787111
Not worth doing.
You can't add 10k seats at the end because, as I said, there's no space for that.40k is all you need for a World Cup.
The roof is the biggest problem - hell if you could remove the roof at the ends and add 10k temporary seats for the World Cup that wouldn't be the worst solution.
I think if the MCG is used for a WC, the AFL season would need to go in hiatus for the 2 month period (the tournament and the month prior to it that Fifa demands exclusive access to stadiums). Can't see how nine Melbourne-based clubs are going to make do with one stadium.You can't add 10k seats at the end because, as I said, there's no space for that.
It also would cost hundreds of millions of dollars to add 12k seats to the eastern stand, and the end product is going to be a venue that isn't going to be deemed worthy of any big World Cup matches.
Much better off saving that money for the MCG redevelopment which, if done right, would be in contention to host the opening match and finals.
The MCG would likely be off limits for 4 months, which is even more reason why the AFL season wouldn't go into hiatus.I think if the MCG is used for a WC, the AFL season would need to go in hiatus for the 2 month period (the tournament and the month prior to it that Fifa demands exclusive access to stadiums).
They would just do something like Bulldogs play 5 home games in Geelong + 2 at WO, North sell 4 home games interstate, 4 other teams sell 1 home game interstate. Factor in the bye rounds, and it leaves 48 Melbourne matches over 16 weeks = 3 games at Marvel per week.Can't see how nine Melbourne-based clubs are going to make do with one stadium.
There is no incentive for the AFL to give up Docklands.Doesn't FIFA get stroppy at the suggestion oval stadiums are used as a venue? So the MCG would be off the table, leaving potentially just docklands. Though don't they also demand 10 host cities? Aus would struggle to meet that criteria anyway, even with NZ, so the stadium in Melbourne is way down the list of issues with a bid.
Though I suppose Qatar shows you can bypass any of their rules so long as you have enough paper bags to go around.
The bid failed badly so there'd need to be changes you'd think.There is no incentive for the AFL to give up Docklands.
If it's going to be in Victoria, it'll be at the MCG, with adjustments made to suit soccer better, hence the extra 2 months.
Same as the plan for the last bid. Nothing has changed since then, except the potential for the MCC to bundle it with a rebuilt Shane Warne Stand.
Seems like drastic measures... and all for an oval stadium?You might be right, but legislation could absolutley force Docklands from the AFL for a WC
Doesn't FIFA get stroppy at the suggestion oval stadiums are used as a venue? So the MCG would be off the table, leaving potentially just docklands. Though don't they also demand 10 host cities? Aus would struggle to meet that criteria anyway, even with NZ, so the stadium in Melbourne is way down the list of issues with a bid.
Though I suppose Qatar shows you can bypass any of their rules so long as you have enough paper bags to go around.
Thanks. Though that looks like a bit of a nightmare. Doable, but with a massive impact on crowds over the course of the season: The likes of Collingwood could be averaging 70,000+ by 2034. I'm also not convinced that the MCG gets rectangularised (assuming it's included i the bid/used as a venue). Last time around the only organisation that thought it was a good idea was the FFA - from memory, the MCC, the Vic Govt and obviously the AFL were all opposed to it.The MCG would likely be off limits for 4 months, which is even more reason why the AFL season wouldn't go into hiatus.
They would just do something like Bulldogs play 5 home games in Geelong + 2 at WO, North sell 4 home games interstate, 4 other teams sell 1 home game interstate. Factor in the bye rounds, and it leaves 48 Melbourne matches over 16 weeks = 3 games at Marvel per week.
It wouldn't disrupt the thing that matters most however, in a monetary sense, which is the broadcast rights. 2 months of no footy in the middle of footy season... not going to be received well by nutjob TV executives like Lewis Martin (see the Ch7 v CA stuff).Thanks. Though that looks like a bit of a nightmare. Doable, but with a massive impact on crowds over the course of the season: The likes of Collingwood could be averaging 70,000+ by 2034. I'm also not convinced that the MCG gets rectangularised (assuming it's included i the bid/used as a venue). Last time around the only organisation that thought it was a good idea was the FFA - from memory, the MCC, the Vic Govt and obviously the AFL were all opposed to it.
The other thing to note is that this time around, there's no feasible second venue in Perth or Adelaide to use if both stadiums in those cities end up being WC venues (I think last time the idea was that they'd hold off decommissioning Subiaco and Football Park). If Australia bids alone, it's very likely that at least Perth Stadium is part of the bid. I'm voting for a 2-month hiatus, leaving the MCG as it's meant to be: all nice and circular.
Of course all of this assumes that the MCG is made available at all. The AFL may just insist on its contract.
Quite easily.I think if the MCG is used for a WC, the AFL season would need to go in hiatus for the 2 month period (the tournament and the month prior to it that Fifa demands exclusive access to stadiums). Can't see how nine Melbourne-based clubs are going to make do with one stadium
There is enough grounds in Regional Victoria to cover. Albury, Moe, Ballarat, Bendigo, Geelong are good enough regional venues that could host games plus Marvel Stadium could be used every day possibly even double headers too if needed not to mention the prospect of suburban grounds like Ikon Park or Whitten Oval if it came to requiring more venues..Quite easily.
Thursday, Friday, Sat 12pm, Sat 7.30pm and Sunday at Marvel could be done.
Move the Saturday Arvo game to Tassie, NT, Ballarat or Geelong depending on prior commercial arrangements if needed/wanted.
MCG would waive any of their contractural agreements with AFL in exchange for hosting the WC which would bring in more $$$ for them.