Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
COL v CAR · GEE v MEL · GCS v ADE · RIC v BL · NM v SYD · GWS v WCE · PA v StK · FRE v WB ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here.
Normal
We all know the omeara trade was horrific at the time but he’s gone now it was 6 years ago can we all just move on. Hawks had a good draft on the surface they got 2 first rounders they clearly rated highly, a big slider in hustwaite and 2 high upside speculative picks (1 they traded in for to get Bailey McDonald). on that criteria that feels like a strong return. They weakened their 2023 position but critically not in the first round and they still hold picks in r2/3 despite them being likely lower than our natural picks. Won’t be at all surprised to see them trade out of 2024 to come back into 2023. I would argue they did better than I expected which would rate them something like a B. Clubs should be evaluated against expectations where meeting expectations is a C. For example lions get a C as they got exactly who they planned to get for about the expected draft capital. That said draft ratings are total clickbait nonsense,Maybe time to start a YouTube channel, anyone with those skills ideally a hawks supporter let me know and let’s make some passive income!
We all know the omeara trade was horrific at the time but he’s gone now it was 6 years ago can we all just move on. Hawks had a good draft on the surface they got 2 first rounders they clearly rated highly, a big slider in hustwaite and 2 high upside speculative picks (1 they traded in for to get Bailey McDonald). on that criteria that feels like a strong return. They weakened their 2023 position but critically not in the first round and they still hold picks in r2/3 despite them being likely lower than our natural picks. Won’t be at all surprised to see them trade out of 2024 to come back into 2023. I would argue they did better than I expected which would rate them something like a B. Clubs should be evaluated against expectations where meeting expectations is a C. For example lions get a C as they got exactly who they planned to get for about the expected draft capital. That said draft ratings are total clickbait nonsense,
Maybe time to start a YouTube channel, anyone with those skills ideally a hawks supporter let me know and let’s make some passive income!
