Society/Culture Why are young males now more right wing then older males?

Remove this Banner Ad

A YouTube video from 8 years ago.

It's a non-stop assault. Somebody help them.

How can they be expected not to turn conservative after being told that "black lives matter" isn't the opposite of "all lives matter"?

Or that cops weren't born with blue skin, so "blue lives matter" isn't a thing?
I find this funny.

Conservative parties are not asking why men are heading in that direction. They've read the room and they understand . They capitalized and they've welcomed them.

It's the Left that are scratching their heads. And their attitude is like yours. You can play it down, but the audacity of mainstream media to take a pot shot like that was sexist (and racist for that matter). That video is emblematic of pervading attitudes towards young men- that there is something wrong with them and they need to change. It's gaslighting to say to young men that it is all in the heads.

If you genuinely want the discourse to move forward, and want to understand why young males are turning conservative...just listen to them. Otherwise, it is going to take a very long time to reverse the trend.
 
I find this funny.

Conservative parties are not asking why men are heading in that direction. They've read the room and they understand . They capitalized and they've welcomed them.

It's the Left that are scratching their heads. And their attitude is like yours. You can play it down, but the audacity of mainstream media to take a pot shot like that was sexist (and racist for that matter). That video is emblematic of pervading attitudes towards young men- that there is something wrong with them and they need to change. It's gaslighting to say to young men that it is all in the heads.

If you genuinely want the discourse to move forward, and want to understand why young males are turning conservative...just listen to them. Otherwise, it is going to take a very long time to reverse the trend.
I'm listening. Tell my why a Tweet from a footy club is turning young men right wing?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Lol I'm just on the couch watching the cricket. It's nice to have a break.
Merry Christmas to all.
A little off topic but, ghosty Ghost Patrol has assumed you're a guy. Not really important, and you don't have to reveal but are you a guy or a cat, or some other gender / biological something?

Again, you don't have to reveal.
 
View attachment 2194144

Another rage inducing tweet!! JUST SAY MERRY CHRISTMAS!!
I'm now becoming right wing, out of furious and righteous anger!


View attachment 2194145

There's a reason for an increase in rightwing 'positions'. But it's nothing to do with being a conservative.

It is the weaponisation of social media tricking mostly straight, white, males into believing they are under attack from 'the left'.
Which would likely be minuscule in number.
 
Which would likely be minuscule in number.
Are you saying the number of right wing young men is miniscule or the role of social media in the radicalisation of young men is miniscule?
 
Ok before we get too deep into this hypothetical, I don't agree with the premise that all intersectional groups must have an equal share of anything and that this is inherently the best outcome of any system.
You're more than welcome to have that opinion.
But can you explain why?
Why do you believe, with all things being equal, that black people should have less off a 'share' per capita, than white people?

But for the sake of this scenario-
Real life isn't a zero sum game.
Gains in one group do not have to come at the expense of another.
The solution in this example is to take measures to increase the size of the pie.

All groups can benefit. This is a net positive for all those involved.

OK...
It doesn't matter how much you increase or decrease the 'size' of the pie... It's still a 60:40 split, right?
And if anything, increasing the size of the pie will disproportionately benefit the group with the larger existing part.
Right?
So your actually advocating increasing the gap, in terms of real world access.


At this point you need to ask yourself-
Is your goal to see the disadvantaged group elevated?
Or is it also to penalise those groups that are doing well and drag them back to the mean?

Thus, despite a net positive, would you avoid this solution because it doesn't handicap the successful group (eg one with a particular skin colour?)

You may have a different view on this to me. But I believe that there is no substantive genetic difference between any race of humans.
And that there should be no ongoing disparate outcomes between two groups of people, based purely on the colour of their skin.

But you're welcome to argue otherwise.
 
Yep...it's all in their heads.
Dear white guys
I literally said the opposite. I also showed actual real world examples that impacted people posting in this thread.

Another obvious example would be that clip you linked.
You didn't see it when it came out. And you never would have seen it.
You only know it exists, because it's been shared with you as evidence of straight, white males being under attack.
 
Yeah haven't seen the blue rinse set for a while, def a minority.
I don't know if you're kidding.
Blue hair isn't a demographic or a minority.
It's mostly used as a pejorative akin to soy, woke, Marxist etc.


But then again, I can't read the minds of everyone with blue hair, or everyone who's ever observed a person with blue hair. So it must be impossible for me to make any kind of assertion.


And just on how unbelievably ridiculous you're being with that "unless you can read the mind of that person" brainrot.
How do you think courts, judges our legal systems exist and function???
Do you think they gain special mind-reading powers?? They gain the ability to know intent or not during 4th year??
It's just such a mind-numbingly stupid and cowardly statement.
It's infuriating.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You're more than welcome to have that opinion.
But can you explain why?
Why do you believe, with all things being equal, that black people should have less off a 'share' per capita, than white people?
That’s not what he said. There’s the reasonable point of why does every job need every share of positions to mirror every possible demographic exactly? Should there be jobs where you can legally block any group out? Of course not! Should you then dictate that teacher, nurse, board numbers, any job, must be 50/50 male/female or whatever demographic group split you’re advocating? That’s ridiculous. The combination of who actually WANTS those jobs AND who’re actually qualified for them should be the only factors taken into account.

We’re all here fans of the AFL, would anyone here be happy if the next 9 coaches appointed had to be female to get us to 50/50 representation, regardless if the best person? I doubt it? Yet in 10-20 years time, once there’s been a generation or AFLW players and AFLW coaches, some will get line positions and eventually a head coach position for the guys, and a few idiots aside, most won’t care, because they would have been appointed as the best person for the position, not to fill a quota.
 
Last edited:
I literally said the opposite. I also showed actual real world examples that impacted people posting in this thread.
Not quite the opposite.
You said that men were being tricked by social media into believing they are under attack by the left.
So allow me to undertake the necessary mental gymnastics here...

Does this mean the Left actually love the patriarchy? Masculinity isn't toxic? They want more males in positions of power? How silly of us!

Sure. Men aren't actually under attack by the left. They just believe they are. It's all in their...heads.

You are subscribing to a conspiracy that would make Qanon proud.


Another obvious example would be that clip you linked.
You didn't see it when it came out. And you never would have seen it.
I'm not sure how or why you make all these assumptions here. It's a little frustrating to be honest.

Who do you think you are telling me when I saw this? What could you possibly know about me?

I do remember when it came out. And it was appropriately met with a great deal of pushback online, which prompted MTv to take it down and try to disassociate from it and bury it.

You only know it exists, because it's been shared with you as evidence of straight, white males being under attack.

And then you tell me how I know it exists?

It must be strange having a brain that goes, "let's just make some shit up."
 
I don't know if you're kidding.
Blue hair isn't a demographic or a minority.
It's mostly used as a pejorative akin to soy, woke, Marxist etc.
Well I was asked what is the link between those with blue hair and others. So what do they have in common? I'd say they're minorities. Call it what you like.
And just on how unbelievably ridiculous you're being with that "unless you can read the mind of that person" brainrot.
Go have a sook about it, but no one should assume something about someone else based on not knowing for sure what they're thinking.
It's infuriating.
Billy Crystal Crying GIF by MOODMAN

How do you think courts, judges our legal systems exist and function???
If you're alluding that the courts, judges and the legal system function by reading minds then you'd be wrong.

They usually work by using facts provided to them.
 
I did already, here it is again. Like I said read the post I replied to and then read my post again.
View attachment 2194911
Now you can clarify why you're asking this, and why you think it's so important for me to clarify my position.
You can directly answer my question or you can get removed from the thread for trolling
 
You can directly answer my question or you can get removed from the thread for trolling
Sigh.

The amount of white, straight males being tricked into believing they're under attack from the left would likely be minuscule.

There you have your answer.

Which I've already clearly explained to you more than once and which I clearly explained in the post in question.

Now, clarify why this is so important to you.
 
Sigh.

The amount of white, straight males being tricked into believing they're under attack from the left would likely be minuscule.

There you have your answer.

Which I've already clearly explained to you more than once and which I clearly explained in the post in question.

Now, clarify why this is so important to you.
Ok so if it's miniscule why do so many young men say they're right wing because they're under attack from the left?
 
You're more than welcome to have that opinion.
But can you explain why?
Why do you believe, with all things being equal, that black people should have less off a 'share' per capita, than white people?


I do not believe that black people should have less of a share per capita than white people.

But then again I don't colour code human beings.


OK...
It doesn't matter how much you increase or decrease the 'size' of the pie... It's still a 60:40 split, right?
And if anything, increasing the size of the pie will disproportionately benefit the group with the larger existing part.
Right?
So your actually advocating increasing the gap, in terms of real world access.

Not necessarily. It depends on what variables you wish to add. You are selectively adding them here to support your position, with your presumptions about disproportionate uptake.

But no, I am not advocating for increasing the gap as a matter of policy.

You gave me an overly simple scenario. I gave you a solution that solved the stated problem in a way that wasn't racist and disadvantaged no one.



And that there should be no ongoing disparate outcomes between two groups of people, based purely on the colour of their skin.

But you're welcome to argue otherwise.

That's cool, but totally academic.

In reality, outcomes are not based purely on skin colour. And that's where we are. Reality. Which is why disparity can manifest due to countless other variables.

Prosperity stems from a combination of personal discipline, ethical values, and a commitment to continuous improvement and meaningful relationships. Which is why cashed up sports stars can loose their fortune within years of retirement.

Government intervention / racist policy is no substitute for the cultural inculcation of these principles, without which 100% of people from all ethnic groups will fail.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Society/Culture Why are young males now more right wing then older males?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top