doona
SMFC
Sorry, had to start this early to say:
McCarthy
McCarthy
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
It looks like Tippa and Libba have saved themselves from being round 8 trades.
It will now be Menadue for Petracca and Mills for Rocky (unless he stinks it up tomorrow).
Everyone on my bench has scored so much better than my on ground crap.
Libba, Wallis, Dahlhaus and Bont all benefited from less midfield rotations as we omitted two inside mids (Stevens and Jong) for two forwards (Redpath and Daniel). The set up was similar to last year and ensured those guys played more minutes onball.i think Mills is ripe - time to sell
Liberatore has saved himself - hold
Might hold McCarthy with Mitch Brown's good form warranting him an onfield defensive spot currently, so McCarthy can rot at F8 until a good forward rookie comes around.
Mills and Gray are on the chopping block obviously though, cutting Gray (was part of my plan the lesser 2 of Gray, Wells and Kerridge would get cut for upgrades) would leave me more cash for further upgrades.
Will be interesting to see who's available and stuff next week, would love to bring in Steven who should bottom out this week, but depends on availabilities.
McCarthy is injured and has a history of injuryId cut McCarthy before Gray. McCarthy is only going to loose money, where as gray could be back.
I am going to hold gray for a few weeks, to see if he gets back in the team. I just have a feeling he has the hallmarks of a player that you will regret trading out. For me, fielding petracca for example over him, you don't loose points.
I don't either. Look at what Polec did after one week in the two's. I think they would be expecting something similar from Gray.If he comes in favour next week/the week after you are closer to finishing your team without burning a trade
Personally I don't think he is worth ditching just yet.
He's only averaging 79 though, way less than Wells and KerridgeIf he comes in favour next week/the week after you are closer to finishing your team without burning a trade
Personally I don't think he is worth ditching just yet.
Ah ****Marcus Adams busted finger
Will miss a couple of weeks
He's only averaging 79 though, way less than Wells and Kerridge
Sure he could improve a bit, but he won't be a top forward, something I want to have is the best 6 forwards at seasons end, I think I have four already, I need two more (Dahl, Montagna, Dusty etc).
Also, he seems to score well when he's allowed to run free (something he could do last year without Polec and White around), I don't think his inside work is that great, he reminds me of the Matt Wrights a bit.
We weren't spoiled by Kerridge and Wells as FWD eligible rookies though that year, I think we had Polec and a few decent defensive rooks like KK, Langdon and McDonald etc but there was nothing that stood out that I can remember.79 is a good average for an F7/M9 come seasons end. I think it was you that used the C.Wingard example in your best year
I expected Mills to score >80 against Essendon yet he was rarely seen after 1/4 time. Wasn't on the bench for extended periods (80% game time) so I can't explain his lack of ball. 3 frees against didn't help.Did you watch the game? If so, what's with Callum Mills? Role change? Injury?
I see no value in holding someone in a certain position when you can upgrade him to someone who is scoring 20-30 more points a week than him
I expected Mills to score >80 against Essendon yet he was rarely seen after 1/4 time. Wasn't on the bench for extended periods (80% game time) so I can't explain his lack of ball. 3 frees against didn't help.
It was going to be Libba for Rocky next week but this week's scores have changed that trade.
Agreed.He is more playing a role I feel in the team. The position he is played in, won't be fantasy friendly. I reckon he is at about his peak. I can't see him going 400k+
We have 8 blokes on the bench, 3 blokes I rely on weren't playing this week which hurts, two were keepers.I have players like Ablett, Cripps, etc... that I could upgrade to someone averaging 20-30 points more then them. What is the point of burning a trade?
Keeping a player like McCarthy, who won't make money, you can't chuck an emergency on will mean that moving forward you will have a worse team.
For example, you have Chol, McCarthy, Dunkley, Davis, Tucker on the pine. Where are you going to be making money? At least S. Gray can serve a purpose, where as the players I listed can't
I think you are thinking in AFL Fantasy mode a bit here, RDT is extremely tactical
Like I said, Davis = MacPherson = 100k made, his BE is only 42, he should get that or go close if he plays next week = minimal money lost, but I have a feeling Rocket will use MacPherson as his pressure small forward instead.So me thinking trading rookies that have peaked and not playing verse trading a 400K player selected as a promo to start with is fantasy thinking? I think you have it the wrong way around to be honest.
Davis, Chol, McCarthy will NOT generate you money and will not offer anything to your team, except when they play again may loose you money.
Gray isn't knee jerk though, he's played 6 games 1 100, 2 80s, a 70 a 67 and a 55, it's rookie like scoring and his JS is poor. Barlow has been poor only twice, and subpar once (75), but has tonned up twice and scored a 99 and a 84, inconsistent but you take the good with the bad.Anyway go you pups I think we are just playing different strategies..... Will be interesting to see how it pans out.
I am moving on rookies that are maxed out straight away (as soon as possible) and using my trades on genuine downgrade/upgrade options.
I made a couple of initial selection changes early, but now it is about seeing the rooks moo and moving them to a premo.
In my team, I will keep gray 2/3 weeks to see if he comes back revitalised rather then wasting a trade I may regret. I have confidence in my rooks like petracca/papley to step up in his absence rather then a knee jerk reaction