eaglesfan99
Cancelled
- Oct 7, 2013
- 3,510
- 1,232
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- warriors
Bartell, michie, pav and hurn or swallow, rockliff, buddy and suckling.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I like option 1 because they would score well but option 2 is good too. But I think you should choose Polec instead of Michie.Bartell, michie, pav and hurn or swallow, rockliff, buddy and suckling.
I got rockliff wrong I can get anyone.I like option 1 because they would score well but option 2 is good too. But I think you should choose Polec instead of Michie.
Do you mean you can get Watson, Barlow, Swan, Griffen ect..I got rockliff wrong I can get anyone.
I don't think you can compare Cotch and Murph. One is pushing a top 5 mid in the competition. The other is barely making journos top 50 players in the comp atm. Yes my 118 is opinion based, but the chances of that occurring is far higher than Murph reaching 105.
yes and jelwoodDo you mean you can get Watson, Barlow, Swan, Griffen ect..
Well it's a toss of a coin. Both Op1 and Op2 are good.yes and jelwood
Cotchin (118) & Swallow (85)
vs
Murphy (95) & Enright (95)
Think that is a little more accurate.
Cotchin for me is on par or slightly better I think with all of the above in bold. Again just my opinion. You could throw a blanket over all of them. I personally have Cotch and am very confident this year.Cotch as top 5 mid grabbed my attention
GAJ
Swan
Pendles
Jelwood
Griffen
Watson
Stevie J
Dayne Beams
Dangerfield
Rockliff
I'd have all these guys before Cotch in terms of SC scoring ability for a number of reasons.
In saying that i do think Cotch is an attractive price for those who want to gamble on someone in that price range
Bias point of view much?Murphy 95, ROFL! Book in 110+
I've gone with them.McVeigh v Mitchell
Simpson v Hodge
McVeigh v Mitchell
Simpson v Hodge
I've gone with them.
R.Shaw/Sloane/Libba/Mumford/Gunston + $1,900
Grimes/Swan/Dunstan/Cox/Martin + $68,500vs
McVeigh v Mitchell
Simpson v Hodge
Bias point of view much?
The factual evidence is right in front of your face actually. As soon as Judd started to deteriorate so did Murphy's scores. No one has stepped us since last season to demand the number 1 tag, so again Murphy will cop it. Hence his scores will stay low!Based on factual evidence and analysis
The factual evidence is right in front of your face actually. As soon as Judd started to deteriorate so did Murphy's scores. No one has stepped us since last season to demand the number 1 tag, so again Murphy will cop it. Hence his scores will stay low!
You will find that many players play through 'Injury' every year. If it is not bad enough to sideline him you should not be using that as an excuse. An example is Swan who played through all last season with a wrist injury. He wasn't a dud like Murphy however.Oh not this mythology again. Murphy assumed the number one tags 3 years ago already, he was injured last year, he had no pre-season, he played through injury all season and copped a broken jaw to go along with his other problems. He is fit for the first time in a year properly now.
Macrae v Savage v Jetta
C2B, are you trying to fill a spot in your team?