Current Disappearance of 3yo William Tyrrell Pt 2 * FM guilty of assault & intimidation

[Kurve]

Continued from PART 1

Criminal charges the former foster parents currently face as at 15 April 2022 include:

• Apprehended Violence Orders on both (AVOs)
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster mother *Not Guilty
• Lying to the NSW Crime Commission on former foster father *Not Guilty
• 2 x charges of assault against a child on former foster mother *Guilty
• 1 x charge of assault against a child on former foster father *Not Guilty
• Stalking &/or Intimidation on both *Guilty
• Dummy bidding real estate fraud *Guilty

TIMELINE

Where's William Tyrrell? - The Ch 10 podcast (under Coroner's subpoena)

Operation Arkstone

 

[js47]

I still cannot believe this whole mess’s answers are founded on a cheap camera from Bali it boggles the mind.
Multi million projects fail so I think it is ridiculous to think an app can confirm a time on this cheap camera I just shake my head.
If it was so cold why were they sitting outside on a hard deck on freezing plastic chairs. Colouring in on boards?

 

[Wallace52]

I still cannot believe this whole mess’s answers are founded on a cheap camera from Bali it boggles the mind.
Multi million projects fail so I think it is ridiculous to think an app can confirm a time on this cheap camera I just shake my head.
If it was so cold why were they sitting outside on a hard deck on freezing plastic chairs. Colouring in on boards?

Why weren’t they drawing inside?

 

[Underarrest_]

Why weren’t they drawing inside?

True, as well as the cold, not a really comfortable place to be drawing unless you had a little table and chairs.

 

[Wallace52]

True, as well as the cold, not a really comfortable place to be drawing unless you had a little table and chairs.

Exactly.

 

[31550]

True, as well as the cold, not a really comfortable place to be drawing unless you had a little table and chairs.

I also think it might be reflective of FM and/or FGMs attitude towards the children: Can't be trusted inside the house, might make a mess, interfere with stuff. Put them outside where they can't do any damage to anything (except themselves!).

 

[Wallace52]

I also think it might be reflective of FM and/or FGMs attitude towards the children: Can't be trusted inside the house, might make a mess, interfere with stuff. Put them outside where they can't do any damage to anything (except themselves!).

Defectives should have asked the FM this question.

 

[31550]

Defectives should have asked the FM this question.

Was 'Defective' a Freudian slip?

Detectives should have asked FM lots of questions.

 

[Underarrest_]

I also think it might be reflective of FM and/or FGMs attitude towards the children: Can't be trusted inside the house, might make a mess, interfere with stuff. Put them outside where they can't do any damage to anything (except themselves!).

Yes especially if William was “bouncing out of his skull” as the F Nana said. Could they have just left William to his own devices for a while ( more than five minutes) enjoying the peace.

 

[31550]

Yes especially if William was “bouncing out of his skull” as the F Nana said. Could they have just left William to his own devices for a while ( more than five minutes) enjoying the peace.

I think that we are dealing with people who had no real interest in, or affinity for raising or caring for small children, especially a very young, boisterous boy. I think someone had a (delusional) idea that having one or two children, preferably a girl, who could be seen and not heard, perhaps dressed up and paraded around would complete the impression of a successful, happy family. By fostering they would be seen as charitable, caring people, but would prefer to toss the kids into day care until they were school age, rather than investing their own personal time or effort themselves. I think William's need for attention and boisterous nature was seen as an annoyance to FM and FGM, rather than a normal, or even endearing quality. In a 'normal' situation, children of this age are, and should be, the centre of attention when they are around family - that's just how things are with very young children. It's not normal or natural to expect them to sit quietly and amuse themselves while the adults get on with 'adult stuff'.

 

[Lady O]

I think that we are dealing with people who had no real interest in, or affinity for raising or caring for small children, especially a very young, boisterous boy. I think someone had a (delusional) idea that having one or two children, preferably a girl, who could be seen and not heard, perhaps dressed up and paraded around would complete the impression of a successful, happy family. By fostering they would be seen as charitable, caring people, but would prefer to toss the kids into day care until they were school age, rather than investing their own personal time or effort themselves. I think William's need for attention and boisterous nature was seen as an annoyance to FM and FGM, rather than a normal, or even endearing quality. In a 'normal' situation, children of this age are, and should be, the centre of attention when they are around family - that's just how things are with very young children. It's not normal or natural to expect them to sit quietly and amuse themselves while the adults get on with 'adult stuff'.

That's true. In the days when people had lots of kids, there was always company of older kids for the young ones to play with and learn from. Now we put all the young ones in together and expect them to learn.