Expansion Canberra

Remove this Banner Ad

Can you point me to the plans for Manuka - what capacity will be like, etc.?

All I can find is general thought bubbles designed several years ago.

There haven't been any recently published hard plans, but this from an article on the Canberra Times in September looks like they'd be roughly aiming for what the masterplan had laid out around 2013, which is aiming for 20k.

Assuming you don't have a Canberra Times subscription, here are the key points:
ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr is eager to redevelop Manuka Oval, but said that is dependent on securing a BBL licence.

Cricket ACT and the AFL recently unveiled plans to build an eastern grandstand and upgrade spectator amenities. The development would retain the ground's boutique feel while increasing seating capacity.

Barr is confident Manuka Oval can be redeveloped while a new rectangular stadium is built in Bruce and pointed to Tasmania for a way the territory and federal governments can combine to build infrastructure.

"As part of our desire to work with the Commonwealth through the National Capital Investment Framework, there'd be two projects in the stadium space," Barr said.

"[That would mirror] what happened in Tasmania where the Commonwealth invested both in the Hobart new facility and in improving the Launceston one

The bit where it mentions the eastern grandstand was early mentioned in a parliamentary submission from Cricket ACT, where it said:

Importantly, the ACT Government has a strong desire to reshape the eastern side of the ground, which would likely include a permanent grandstand facility with covered seating for spectators and fans, and appropriate corporate hospitality facilities, all designed to enhance Manuka Oval’s current reputation as the best boutique cricket ground in Australia

I can't find the link at the moment, but I remember an article saying it would bring it up to 20k, which is in line with the earlier mentioned masterplan.
 
There haven't been any recently published hard plans, but this from an article on the Canberra Times in September looks like they'd be roughly aiming for what the masterplan had laid out around 2013, which is aiming for 20k.

Assuming you don't have a Canberra Times subscription, here are the key points:


The bit where it mentions the eastern grandstand was early mentioned in a parliamentary submission from Cricket ACT, where it said:



I can't find the link at the moment, but I remember an article saying it would bring it up to 20k, which is in line with the earlier mentioned masterplan.

Found this on the internet so hopefully y’all can have a look and see if that’s what your alluding to.
 

Found this on the internet so hopefully y’all can have a look and see if that’s what your alluding to.

That's the one. It's deviated a bit since then. We've got the media centre.

But I think the current proposal would be pretty similar to phase three to get it to 20k.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Unfortunately the second article is behind a paywall, but it seems that there are still some issues to be resolved before Canberra gets a new soccer team for the 24-25 season. The team was supposed to be finalised mid last year, but with continual extensions the deal is now against a deadline, with the delay and lack of adequate funding from the ACT Government and Capital Football having a negative impact on the future of Canberra United female soccer team.


 
With continual delays in Canberra getting a men’s team in soccer’s Aleague expansion for the 2024-25 season, now even our well regarded Canberra United women’s soccer team is also having funding issues - with Capital Football desperately looking for additional $ from our ACT Government and other entities to keep Canberra United afloat.

Capital Football continues to explore all avenues to ensure that Canberra United take the field for Season 17, seeking new sources of investment having exhausted traditional revenue and funding streams. We are working alongside the Canberra A-League bid, the APL, and the ACT Government to explore additional opportunities.

 
But that being said, I quite like the prospect of Manuka's future. Relatively central location amongst pubs and restaurants. Will be along the light rail within the decade. It would have much more soul than a mini-Docklands.
The preferred light rail plan seems to go along State Circuit with a stop at the intersection with Sydney Ave, which will be about a 1km walk from Manuka. Is that close enough for people? I wouldn't exactly call it being along the light rail with that kind of walk.

I also see that the light rail is to have a stop directly outside Phillip Oval. Do you think it would be worth having the stadium there? Further away from the city centre, but a stop right outside is convenient.
 
The preferred light rail plan seems to go along State Circuit with a stop at the intersection with Sydney Ave, which will be about a 1km walk from Manuka. Is that close enough for people? I wouldn't exactly call it being along the light rail with that kind of walk.

Along might be a bit of mayo, but I still think a light rail stop only 1km away makes it much more accessible. 1km sounds a lot as a distance, but it's only a 14-minute walk.

Still half the distance from the train to Carrara. And 400m less than the Gabba.

Fingers crossed they choose the dog leg option though. Only 750m, 10 minutes.

I also see that the light rail is to have a stop directly outside Phillip Oval. Do you think it would be worth having the stadium there? Further away from the city centre, but a stop right outside is convenient.

I'm definitely not opposed to Phillip. Good transport, relatively central, lots of pubs and restaurants nearby.

Only downside is it's starting from scratch. A new stadium at Phillip would, I assume, cost more than an upgraded Manuka. And a new (non-rectangular) stadium would be a big ask in Canberra.
 
Along might be a bit of mayo, but I still think a light rail stop only 1km away makes it much more accessible. 1km sounds a lot as a distance, but it's only a 14-minute walk.
For an able-bodied adult, yes. I think it makes Manuka more accessible, but not truly convenient to access.

Still half the distance from the train to Carrara.
Nobody should be making comparisons to Carrara. It's the most poorly located ground in the league and should only be used as an example of what not to do.

And 400m less than the Gabba.
The Gabba is getting a train station next door within two years.

Fingers crossed they choose the dog leg option though. Only 750m, 10 minutes.
That would be better. Still not as convenient as it could be, but better.

I'm definitely not opposed to Phillip. Good transport, relatively central, lots of pubs and restaurants nearby.

Only downside is it's starting from scratch. A new stadium at Phillip would, I assume, cost more than an upgraded Manuka. And a new (non-rectangular) stadium would be a big ask in Canberra.
Fair call. I guess it depends on what the government would go for.
 
For an able-bodied adult, yes. I think it makes Manuka more accessible, but not truly convenient to access.


Nobody should be making comparisons to Carrara. It's the most poorly located ground in the league and should only be used as an example of what not to do.


The Gabba is getting a train station next door within two years.


That would be better. Still not as convenient as it could be, but better.


Fair call. I guess it depends on what the government would go for.

You're right for everything. In an ideal world, I'd love a stop right next door. But in a multi-code city with two, possibly three, full-time rectangular teams crying for a new stadium, I think it'd be an uphill battle to get a new stadium built at Phillip.

So I think we have to make the best of what we've got at Manuka. I hope the AFL is lobbying in the background for the closer of the two light rail options.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Along might be a bit of mayo, but I still think a light rail stop only 1km away makes it much more accessible. 1km sounds a lot as a distance, but it's only a 14-minute walk.

Still half the distance from the train to Carrara. And 400m less than the Gabba.

Fingers crossed they choose the dog leg option though. Only 750m, 10 minutes.



I'm definitely not opposed to Phillip. Good transport, relatively central, lots of pubs and restaurants nearby.

Only downside is it's starting from scratch. A new stadium at Phillip would, I assume, cost more than an upgraded Manuka. And a new (non-rectangular) stadium would be a big ask in Canberra.
Canberra would need a stadium with a capacity larger than 20k to support an AFL side. Odds are that the AFL would demand a new modern stadium like they have in Tasmania as well.

Ideally you'd want a stadium with a capacity of about 30k, anything less and I guarantee the team would outgrow it relatively quickly.
 
Canberra would need a stadium with a capacity larger than 20k to support an AFL side. Odds are that the AFL would demand a new modern stadium like they have in Tasmania as well.

Ideally you'd want a stadium with a capacity of about 30k, anything less and I guarantee the team would outgrow it relatively quickly.

Unless the oval sports get included in some multiuse stadium, do you think there's a chance of a new 30k oval in Canberra?
 
You'd be better off putting $100M into Manuka by enclosing the outer wing with seating to bring it up to ~20k and putting some sort of overhang over it. You don't want to go down the path of a multipurpose stadium than can covert from rectangular to oval as it doesn't really work in either configuration
 
Canberra would need a stadium with a capacity larger than 20k to support an AFL side. Odds are that the AFL would demand a new modern stadium like they have in Tasmania as well.

Ideally you'd want a stadium with a capacity of about 30k, anything less and I guarantee the team would outgrow it relatively quickly.
The AFL (read broadcasters) does not want big stadiums any more. They want full stadiums that look good and generate atmosphere for TV. 23k will do, same as Tas, GWS & GC. Along the lines of the previous post from PP, build a new eastern stand with some corporate facilities and get it up to 23k. Easy.
 
The AFL (read broadcasters) does not want big stadiums any more. They want full stadiums that look good and generate atmosphere for TV. 23k will do, same as Tas, GWS & GC. Along the lines of the previous post from PP, build a new eastern stand with some corporate facilities and get it up to 23k. Easy.
That, plus perceived lack of supply can jack up prices. Sydney have come out and said, despite increasing fandom in Sydney over the last 10 years, they have no great issue with the fact that they're getting more and more sellouts. They can raise ticket prices, improve the status of the team and make any given ticket seem like a hot one. It's better than than getting a few thousand more people through the gates on the margin.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top