Reply to thread

This is what the tribunal said about the Archer incident: "His duty of care required him to slow more appreciably and earlier in order to give himself the opportunity to avoid or minimise head high contact." 

In the Richmond/Saints game, the player made no impact to the head or neck, so how is it the same incident? Had they crashed into Jones' head then sure, there's likely a case to answer (impact depending on concussion or not), but that didn't happen so where's the argument that the duty of care was breached? What would the basis of this MRO charge be?