
- Sep 30, 2015
- 3,961
- 5,918
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Brisbane Lions v Collingwood - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Pies at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
LIVE: Brisbane Lions v Collingwood - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Pies at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
I think OP’s question is more about how well the expert analysts can pick the favourite, teams defying the odds, etc.Oh cool.
More content on gambling.
Not like we don't get enough.
Gambling bad gimme likesOh cool.
More content on gambling.
Not like we don't get enough.
Hawks 2008 yes surely, but I recall West Coast only being slight underdogs - it was a hard match to tip. I reckon I tipped Collingwood just because of the venue. The Bulldogs were sentimental favourites in 2016 but surely bookies' underdogs. We were underdogs in both 1997 and 1998.Be interesting to know the longest odds for the winning side. West Coast 2018 or Hawks 2008 would be up there
I think it's worthwhile to point out the ever present saturation of gambling.Gambling bad gimme likes
Just don't click on the thread champ
Pretty good source, but only goes up back to 2009.I think OddsPortal would have this.
Last year you could get $3 on Geelong winning margin 1-100 on a couple of the smaller sites. Suffice to say there were some nervous punters in the last quarter.
I have been curious, what have been the premiership favourite odds for teams throughout the years the week of the Grand Final? I believe many are archived online, but some may only be in newspapers for older Grand Finals.
View attachment 1704408
2017 perception of the premier during Grand Final week.
TAB’s Grand Final odds
1995 – Carlton ($1.87) defeated Geelong ($2) by 61 points
1996 – North Melbourne ($1.29) defeated Sydney ($3.60) by 43 points
1997 – St Kilda ($1.32) lost to Adelaide ($3.40) by 31 points
1998 – North Melbourne ($1.50) lost to Adelaide ($2.62) by 35 points
1999 – North Melbourne ($1.25) defeated Carlton ($3.50) by 35 points
2000 – Essendon ($1.20) defeated Melbourne ($4.50) by 60 points
2001 – Essendon ($1.80) lost to Brisbane ($2) by 26 points
2002 – Brisbane ($1.22) defeated Collingwood ($4.25) by 9 points
2003 – Collingwood ($1.80) lost to Brisbane ($2.05) by 50 points
2004 – Brisbane ($1.47) lost to Port Adelaide ($2.75) by 40 points
2005 – Sydney ($1.85) defeated West Coast ($2) by 4 points
2006 – West Coast ($1.62) defeated Sydney ($2.35) by 1 point
2007 – Geelong ($1.42) defeated Port Adelaide ($3) by 119 points
2008 – Geelong ($1.38) lost to Hawthorn ($3.25) by 26 points
2009 – Geelong ($1.58) defeated St Kilda ($2.42) by 12 points
2010 – Collingwood ($1.40) drew with St Kilda ($3)
2010 Replay – Collingwood ($1.60) defeated St Kilda ($2.40) by 56 points
2011 – Geelong ($1.82) defeated Collingwood ($2.05) by 38 points
2012 – Hawthorn ($1.55) lost to Sydney ($2.55) by 10 points
2013 – Hawthorn ($1.60) defeated Fremantle ($2.40) by 15 points
2014 – Sydney ($1.55) lost to Hawthorn ($2.55) by 63 points
2015 – Hawthorn ($1.60) defeated West Coast ($2.45) by 46 points
2016 – Sydney ($1.52) lost to Western Bulldogs ($2.60) by 22 points
2017 – Adelaide ($1.65) lost to Richmond ($2.30) by 48 points
https://www.bigbonusbets.com.au/tabs-afl-grand-final-betting-guide-2018/
Adelaide 1997 the biggest upset of modern times.
The dude was just asking who was the favourite for each grand final . You cannot bet on these games as they have already happened. Whinging about gambling in this case is just softI think it's worthwhile to point out the ever present saturation of gambling.
Collingwood should never have been favourites against us tbh.
Also can't believe Port were paying as low as $3 in 2007.
2003 will be one of the great mysteries in life. Guess that’s one of the good things about bookmaking. If they’re happy to take the price so be it5 year aftertiming - enjoy your ban