Search results for query: *

Totally agree! And you don't dump premiums on the basis of one bad performance. I've seen people consider swapping out Miller because of his 76. FFS, he's averaging 117! Btw ... have these comments from Brett Ratten been mentioned yet; I confess I haven't read every post. It may be goodbye...

Jesus ... six trades already? I can't understand why anyone traded Gawn at this stage, just because he had a below average score and some random player had a good game. You picked your team for a reason. Be conservative.

Gotta be logical about it. Stephens scores a 20-something, but the solution is not to bring a guy who has scored 19 already. Put Stephens on the bench for at least this week. You'll make more money than bringing in Driscoll, which is utterly pointless and makes you less money.

I think he'll play, in which case this is a bad call. Basically, 1. you're dumping a rookie with a 95 in round 2 (which will still be a guaranteed part of his price adjustment next week) 2. you're bringing in another rookie who has a 19 and a 49 as part of his price adjustments in coming weeks...