wasnt it 5 shots? warning shot also? im tipping 1 to shoot drone then the rest to shoot russ and carol, covering himself with exact shots in case somebody heard the shots.
He won’t take the stand imo and if he does he is gone, the prosecution will tear him a new one, I can’t see how any reasonable person could possibly find him not guilty.
Easy to say when 2 of the people who know the truth are dead.. he is odds on the found guilty of murder.. there is more then enough reasonable double that 2 people don’t die in struggle.. the prosecution will take his story apart.
Does the lawyer help with him with his utensil and bull story? Or did Lynn just make it up and the lawyer accepts it..
it was Lynn’s only option really.. but burning bodies then returning to check on bodies doesn’t bode well for him for as a “I panicked” excuse, it was well thought out..
based...
They don’t really need to disprove his theory, they can put their theory forward and ask which is more likely, 2 accidents is so unlikely it can’t be true..
He’s a goner, claiming accidental death.. not with 2 people, burned the bodies, went back to check.. he is odds on to be convicted, will say he panicked blah blah blah.. defence will prob have people say Russell could be aggressive etc..
Main things I am thinking about in this case, how do they know she was shot? Have they found her skull?
Did he confess to where the bodies are?
My uneducated guess in the delay was due to his long interview, around 3 days from memory? They were trying to get his interview struck out for...
4 week trial, shot carol it is alleged, going to be a fascinating trial, lots of hearsay I would think, would like to hear what the prosecution believe was the motive.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.