- Joined
- May 5, 2009
- Posts
- 22,688
- Reaction score
- 31,313
- AFL Club
- Essendon
You missed my point.
If someone plays the whole season then sure you have a case. Problem was Long didn’t and was injured. You can not say he could do this or that week in and week out because he didn’t.
You don’t have to lecture me on Tsatas. I was in the minority that was a strong no.
As for Hobbs I was not really in his camp either. Liked his leadership and hardness but I was not a fan of another 180 cm midfielder.
You simply can’t not say Long should have gone top 20 based on 3 games. It is a total hindsight thing to say.
I understand what you are saying as far as prototype player but it is totally unrealistic to say you can nail it based on three games.
Different story if he plays even 12 games and they are at a similar level.
I was more a Goater fan in that draft. Bigger size midfielder. Did not mind Knevit either.
I didn't say where Long should have been drafted, just that no sensible analysis would have had him 50 picks later that Hobbs.
Don't get me wrong, this is not just an Essendon problem. If Long didn't have a Collingwood connection he'd not be on an AFL list. He'd be playing VFL beating the piss out of AFL players like Ben Hobbs.
As I keep saying it's about having a coherent set of principles the recruiters can use to make predictions so that they can make good calls, rather than making calls based on dogma.
Last edited:





