NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 4

Remove this Banner Ad

Here is PART 3

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary will be deleted and warnings issued, that includes mockery and trying to pass it off as a joke.

Play nice, please.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

NBN couldn't connect me by cable and their satelite plans are useless. Uncle Elon dropped off a Starlink dish and within minutes I was getting 300 mbps. I've got friends who say they don't like Musk but love Starlink. They've got a dish on the roof of their caravan. It connects anywhere and they only pay when they are on the road.

The government is Starlink's biggest customer in Australia. Police vehicles can get a good signal in remote areas. The Navy is using it out in the ocean to connect sailors with their families.


(Cost re equipment and monthly charges was my question?)
I also added the costs direct from Starlink USA for people living in the USA,
You have kindly replied re speeds etc but that was not my question sir.
 
Last edited:
Mate I addressed the claim twice but you weren't interested, you were more interested in making ad hom attacks and mocking Twitter users alternative handles. You just can't help yourself. I will try to tone the mockery down from this point as well. Maybe we can get somewhere.
See? You just can't do it.

Lets examine your claim here in a calm, evidence-based manner - that being, a twitter post you referenced explained how and why the info Hegseth posted to the chat was not in fact classified. Here's the post;



There appears to be one point (number 2) exclusively focused whether the info was classified or not, and another (3) mentioning it peripherally.

Could you please explain how someone on twitter posting "No actionable (and therefore no classified) information in any of it" or "He believed it to be classified information at the time he disclosed it to the Atlantic" overrules the actual DNI Classification Guide, wherein the relevant section it states "lnformation providing indication or advance warning that the US or its allies are preparing an attack" is classified as TS, or Top Secret.

Help me understand your rationale here.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

There appears to be one point (number 2) exclusively focused whether the info was classified or not, and another (3) mentioning it peripherally.

Could you please explain how someone on twitter posting "No actionable (and therefore no classified) information in any of it" or "He believed it to be classified information at the time he disclosed it to the Atlantic" overrules the actual DNI Classification Guide, wherein the relevant section it states "lnformation providing indication or advance warning that the US or its allies are preparing an attack" is classified as TS, or Top Secret.

Help me understand your rationale here.

No problem. Could you do one thing for me first? Now that we're going to both try and treat each other like adults could you please give me another answer other than ROFL to the question I posed you at #2,842.

Edit: You should probably have another go with an answer to #2,990 which was about exactly what we are now discussing.
 
Last edited:
NBN couldn't connect me by cable and their satelite plans are useless. Uncle Elon dropped off a Starlink dish and within minutes I was getting 300 mbps. I've got friends who say they don't like Musk but love Starlink. They've got a dish on the roof of their caravan. It connects anywhere and they only pay when they are on the road.

The government is Starlink's biggest customer in Australia. Police vehicles can get a good signal in remote areas. The Navy is using it out in the ocean to connect sailors with their families.



You've tried this argument elsewhere.

Starlink is in no way a viable replacement for the entire NBN infrastructure model.

Starlink is a good product for some people.

A person can also think Elon Musk is a giant POS whilst utilising the Starlink product.

Hope that covers it all for you.
 
Well this ought to be good. How? The fact that I can use a search engine = I must be 'cranky'? Or is it maybe if I was actually cranky I would know that BlueE is actually female, so therefore I'm trying to hide that secret knowledge by not referring to them as female? 🤣

Nice conspiracy theory. Lucky we're in the right place for it. :thumbsu:

This little charade again, "I'm not CrankItUp, I swear". The same stunt you tried to pull with your HaveCrankOnMe alias before you eventually conceded it was you.

It's not hard to figure out, your posting style and places you post in doesn't change. You want to know your biggest tell?

1743486282811.png
1743486298243.png
1743486317939.png

Been on here 19 years now, no one else posts links in the fashion of #number like you do.


Not sure why you try to pretend it's not you, you really aren't as smart as you think you are.
 
Written and approved by Elon Musk :tearsofjoy:



Cheers for the justice Pammy, Epstein files and J6 pardons for violent assaults on police firmly in the rearview lol

Bonbons continues to ignore the FBI’s involvement on that day while throwing his continued support behind those who wilfully destroy other people’s property.
 
54c639ad4376eb411276b2b31b97e32b.gif


Thats correct mate, mocking you guys is the vast majority of my contributions here. What else is there to do? Actual rational, evidence-based discussion is impossible in this thread, its simply not the place for it - you believe in nothing, have no principles and will just shill for dear leader and his admin in literally every circumstance regardless of any actual establilshed facts.

A perfect example of this with the SignalGate stuff - you're still somehow pretending that there was no classified info. But when asked to rationalise that, to actually explain your belief and how timings of strikes don't = classified so anyone reading this thread might be able to possibly work out what you're on about, you either just keep stating that it isn't classified based on nothing more than your own vibes and feels, or you just ignore it while trying to steer the discussion to anything but that point, such as your laughable attempt to paint the journalist's actions as somehow reprehensible :drunk:

So I ask again - in such an environment, dealing with extremists so obviously and willfully disconnected from reality, what else is there to do but mock such people?

Prove me wrong now if you like? Only the 7th time or so asking how timings of future military strikes don't = classified, maybe this time you can either manage an reasoned evidence-backed argument or finally concede that yes, of course such info would be classified. Do this and I promise I won't mock you for finally acknowledging reality, in fact I'll take the mocking down a notch and try to engage with you in a more harmonious manner. This could be a new start, where we exchange actual arguments based in fact and perhaps even occasionally inform each other on various topics.

Certainly not holding my breath but the offer is there.
Military strikes against who?
 
This little charade again, "I'm not CrankItUp, I swear". The same stunt you tried to pull with your HaveCrankOnMe alias before you eventually conceded it was you.

It's not hard to figure out, your posting style and places you post in doesn't change. You want to know your biggest tell?

View attachment 2268779
View attachment 2268780
View attachment 2268782

Been on here 19 years now, no one else posts links in the fashion of #number like you do.


Not sure why you try to pretend it's not you, you really aren't as smart as you think you are.

No, I'm Crankitup. Check out my posts #2,090 and #1,833.
 
This little charade again, "I'm not CrankItUp, I swear". The same stunt you tried to pull with your HaveCrankOnMe alias before you eventually conceded it was you.

It's not hard to figure out, your posting style and places you post in doesn't change. You want to know your biggest tell?

View attachment 2268779
View attachment 2268780
View attachment 2268782

Been on here 19 years now, no one else posts links in the fashion of #number like you do.


Not sure why you try to pretend it's not you, you really aren't as smart as you think you are.

Not sure why you'd go to all that trouble or even care.

Weird as ****.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Not sure why you'd go to all that trouble or even care.

Weird as ****.

As opposed to trying to repeatedly deny you have returned again like Cranky has?

Not surprised you don't think that's weird
 
I don't at present. But I won't be acting like some weirdo primary school tattle tale stalker online either.
Called someone out for posting bs, and not the first time they've done it either. Its weird and bizarre Cranky plays the dumb games to begin with. It's like a kid hiding behind a chain link fence in a game of hide and seek. It's not fooling anyone.

If you don't like it, move on. But again strange how anything to the right you give a pass to.
 
Called someone out for posting bs, and not the first time they've done it either. Its weird and bizarre Cranky plays the dumb games to begin with. It's like a kid hiding behind a chain link fence in a game of hide and seek. It's not fooling anyone.

If you don't like it, move on. But again strange how anything to the right you give a pass to.

Sounds like some stranger is living rent free in your head.
 
Starlink is in no way a viable replacement for the entire NBN infrastructure model.

Starlink is a good product for some people.

A person can also think Elon Musk is a giant POS whilst utilising the Starlink product.

We are here because EasternTiger highlighted the Biden administration spending $42 billion to expand broadband but connected ZERO homes.

Then we got into Rudd and 'underpants on head' Conroy saying the NBN would be an asset that the government could sell for a profit. Whoops!

Between inception in 2007 and 2013, when Labor lost office, only 180,000 premises had been connected. Projected costs had blown out to $73 billion ie $6,300 per property.

A government monopoly committed to a single technology was a stupid idea in so many ways. Fibre to every Australian premise was unfeasibly expensive. The rollout was extremely slow. It took no account of future technology changes such as VDSL, last leg copper and satelite services such as Starlink.

And now we have an Albo election promise of another $3 billion after Labor said the NBN was already finished. $4,800 per property. It needs to be DOGEd.
 
We are here because EasternTiger highlighted the Biden administration spending $42 billion to expand broadband but connected ZERO homes.

Then we got into Rudd and 'underpants on head' Conroy saying the NBN would be an asset that the government could sell for a profit. Whoops!

Between inception in 2007 and 2013, when Labor lost office, only 180,000 premises had been connected. Projected costs had blown out to $73 billion ie $6,300 per property.

A government monopoly committed to a single technology was a stupid idea in so many ways. Fibre to every Australian premise was unfeasibly expensive. The rollout was extremely slow. It took no account of future technology changes such as VDSL, last leg copper and satelite services such as Starlink.

And now we have an Albo election promise of another $3 billion after Labor said the NBN was already finished. $4,800 per property. It needs to be DOGEd.
Zero homes connected to what may places I ask?
Off the map places?
Rome was not built in a day sir.
Heck I wish I had fiber to fiber connection but not the end of the world.
Frank you have still ignored my question about starlink costs I actually thought this would be great at $369 a year.
 
Called someone out for posting bs, and not the first time they've done it either. Its weird and bizarre Cranky plays the dumb games to begin with. It's like a kid hiding behind a chain link fence in a game of hide and seek. It's not fooling anyone.

If you don't like it, move on. But again strange how anything to the right you give a pass to.
Shut up and stick to the topic
 
This little charade again, "I'm not CrankItUp, I swear".

Been on here 19 years now, no one else posts links in the fashion of #number like you do.

Are you sure about that?

Sorry, what tweet is this? You asked mitigating questions (that you would never ask in relation to allegations against people opposed to Trump) in post #667 but I can't see any reference to a tweet?

:$

Seriously though I didn't reference posts that way until ... actually I've explained this before so it's easier if you just read this #3,609. All I do is copy and paste the post number up the top of the post. The reason why I do it is explained in #9,409.


... you really aren't as smart as you think you are.

I don't think I'm very smart at all. I'm already on record in the Ukraine War thread as saying I think that a banned poster BlueE (whose posts I found when searching back through the history of that thread) is a lot smarter than me. #3,339
 

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 4


Write your reply...
Back
Top