Competitions Tigers Team Of The 21st Century
- Thread starter _RT_
- Start date
- Tagged users None
One of my favourite players to ever wear the yellow and black, never missed a target, deadly on both feet
- Oct 25, 2006
- 24,018
- 36,730
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- B.S.C youngboys.. Borussia Dortmund
0 is not a number
You're God. Create a universe. On the first day, is it Year 1 or Year 0?
Or
Decide to start numbering the years from a particular event in History. Let's say we choose today. So everything resets. Is today's date 1/1/0000 or 1/1/0001?
There was no Year Zero.
- Apr 24, 2016
- 562
- 1,255
- AFL Club
- Richmond
If you want to be accurately recording time, it's definitely 1/1/0000.
_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 45,482
- 85,672
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #56
Are you 20 on 1/1/2020 if you were born on 1/1/2000? Yes or No
The new century started on 1/1/2000
0 (zero) is a number, and the numerical digit used to represent that number in numerals. It fulfills a central role in mathematics as the additive identity of the integers, real numbers, and many other algebraic structures. As a digit, 0 is used as a placeholder in place value systems.
In this case there are 365 1/4 days that make up #1 so what your saying is lets just ignore the components that make up the number.
Very slow winger there...
_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 45,482
- 85,672
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #59
It's the first day, after 365.25 days it is the end of the first year.
If we were to reset the date for everything to today it would be 1/1/0000 as we haven't completed a year yet.
When your child is born are the 1 years old?
That's logically incorrect. Following that reasoning, if we were to reset the date for everything to today, it would be 0/0/0000 since we haven't completed a day, or a month either. So tomorrow would be 1/0/0000 - even though it would be the second day.
When we quote 'today's date' we are saying 'today is the first day, of the first month, of the first year'. We are describing the current conditions.
When describing how old some one is, we say how many years they have completed. A child may be 0 years old, but they are in their first year of life.
There are different usages for different situations. eg - education - 'I've completed 2 years - I'm in my 3rd year'. Both are valid, but both use slightly different methods, and both are appropriate for slightly different reasons.
The fact is - historically, there was no Year Zero (in the Gregorian Christian calendar we use). So the first 10 years after Jesus was born (allegedly) started at the beginning of Year 1. And finished at the end of Year 10. And every decade has followed since then.
It is odd that this decade argument (and century/millenium argument that happened in 2000) still pops up - even though everyone accepts and understands that we are currently in the 21st century - despite the current years beginning 20--.
B Nick Vlastuin Alex Rance Dylan Grimes Bachar Houli Joel Bowden Leon Cameron
M Wayne Campbell Trent Cotchin Brett Deledio
F Matthew Richardson Nathan Brown Josh Caddy Jason Castagna Jack Riewoldt Daniel Rioli
R Brad Ottens Toby Nankervis Matthew Knights
I Shane Edwards Kane Lambert Dustin Martin Dion Prestia
M Wayne Campbell Trent Cotchin Brett Deledio
F Matthew Richardson Nathan Brown Josh Caddy Jason Castagna Jack Riewoldt Daniel Rioli
R Brad Ottens Toby Nankervis Matthew Knights
I Shane Edwards Kane Lambert Dustin Martin Dion Prestia
Phar Ace
Brownlow Medallist
Book im Dano!
Phar Ace
Brownlow Medallist
[TD valign="top"]B[/TD][TD valign="top"]Joel Bowden[/TD][TD valign="top"]Darren Gaspar[/TD][TD valign="top"]Dylan Grimes[/TD]
[TD valign="top"]HB[/TD][TD valign="top"]Nick Vlastuin[/TD][TD valign="top"]Alex Rance[/TD][TD valign="top"]Bachar Houli[/TD]
[TD valign="top"]C[/TD][TD valign="top"]Wayne Campbell[/TD][TD valign="top"]Matthew Knights[/TD][TD valign="top"]Brett Deledio[/TD]
[TD valign="top"]HF[/TD][TD valign="top"]Shane Edwards[/TD][TD valign="top"]Brad Ottens[/TD][TD valign="top"]Nathan Brown[/TD]
[TD valign="top"]F[/TD][TD valign="top"]Jack Riewoldt[/TD][TD valign="top"]Matthew Richardson[/TD][TD valign="top"]Daniel Rioli[/TD]
[TD valign="top"]R[/TD][TD valign="top"]Toby Nankervis[/TD][TD valign="top"]Dustin Martin[/TD][TD valign="top"]Trent Cotchin[/TD]
Emerg: Chris Newman Matthew Rogers Kane Johnson
I have a couple of Caveats.
Gaspar, as good as he was, only comes in because frankly we are shy another quality KP Back. I have Bowden there also, to back him up ( just in case we need to run the ball through for behind
). Astbury has played in two Premiership sides and is very unlucky not be named in the squad in my opinion.Rucks are tricky. Ottens proved at Geelong he was the player we wanted, a Ruck who could play as a forward. Whilst we had him he was a forward whom played a bit in the Ruck. For that reason only I have him at CHF. I want this team to win, so I want Nank in the Ruck to replicate the magic he produced with Cotch and Dusty. Maric on the bench is a spiritual leader, though I would be happy to run Ottens as back up Ruck and bring in Kane Johnson if pressed.
Interchange assumes unlimited interchange. Coughlan should be in the side, but would happily rotate him with Dusty and Knights. Cogs was dead-set champion cruelled by injury. Prestia is probably still a bit lucky, that said, he's a figgen two time premiership player who performed when it matter under duress. Cameron can play anywhere, a more beautiful kick on either stump I am yet to see. Was a great winger at the Dogs, but as back pocket at the Tiges, he came into his own with those long spearing passes over the opposition's wall - in today's football, he breaks the lines.
Last edited:
We are in the 20th year.
OhhDeledio
Premiership Player
did this ever get announced
Similar threads
