Should teams be able to nominate more than one sub?

[kickazz]

With Oscar McInerney

46

Oscar Mcinerney

Age

29

Ht

204cm

Wt

110kg

Pos.

Ruck

Career

Season

Last 5

D

8.1

2star

K

4.1

2star

HB

3.9

3star

CL

1.4

4star

HO

14.3

5star

D

6.9

1star

K

4.1

2star

HB

2.7

2star

CL

1.9

4star

HO

16.4

5star

D

7.6

2star

K

4.0

2star

HB

3.6

3star

CL

0.4

3star

HO

11.2

5star

going down last night, I got to thinking about something that I have thought of a bit before - why do we nominate only one sub?

Interestingly, Brisbane have used Fort as their sub in the past - an interesting choice given he is a ruckman. Normally you'd want a mid or utility as your sub, but in the case of last night, they would have loved to have had Fort available.

So why can't we nominate more than one sub - we pick three emergencies after all.

It would make sense to be able to select at least three subs - one Ruck, one KPP, one on-baller for example. You could still only use one of them, but at least you would be covered for a broader range of injuries (remembering this is the primary purpose of the sub)

The main drawback is scheduling with VFL (or equivalent) games and possibly having even more players "missing footy" on a given weekend.

But is there any other good reason? Other sports tend to not have this limitation. Just seems bizarre to limit your choice to one. And surely, come Prelim and Grand Final time, it would be fairer to be able to name an extended sub list.

Thoughts?

 

[It Just Is]

Not until there is an AFL reserves league - otherwise availability would depends on a semi-pro state league fixture and differ for each team.

That said, the sub seems pointless to me. I’d rather see it scraped altogether.

 

[LordLucifer]

How about we do away with the sub thing altogether ??

It was brought in to cover for concussions but has descended into a complete rort.

 

[MC Extra Dollop]

I think two subs would be okay. Both can be used if a player sustains a game ending injury before half time, otherwise only one of the two is used. Unused/emergency sub can play in the reserves if it's later in the weekend, or one or both can play in the reserves if the state league game comes first on the weekend (presumably they'd only play a quarter or something and you'd only consider it with the player you've earmarked as the emergency sub).

You'd still get emergencies missing a game on a given weekend when the seniors and reserves are playing in different states, but not much you can do about that.

Really, under the current rules though, I think Geelong's system and selections were much better than Brisbane's and the Lions should wear that. Stewart and McInernay being subbed out at the same time should not have resulted in a net win to the Cats, but that's unquestionably how it panned out, because Geelong's system held up and Brisbane's fell apart like a soggy taco.