Doomsday/Prophecies deagel.com

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

lol wtf..our population is going to decrease by 61% in the next 10 years?

Well I guess the positive to that will be we can stop building houses on tiny blocks with no back yards and we can go back to quarter acre or biggerv:p
 
FPPF said:
lol wtf..our population is going to decrease by 61% in the next 10 years?

Well I guess the positive to that will be we can stop building houses on tiny blocks with no back yards and we can go back to quarter acre or biggerv:p
Click to expand...
If it true I reckon it could be a warning to get out of heavily populated cities.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

This website is non-profit, built on spare time and we provide our information and services AS IS without further explanations and/or guarantees. We are not linked to any government. Take into account that the forecast is nothing more than a game of numbers whether flawed or correct based upon some speculative assumptions.

Ancile

www.deagel.com www.deagel.com

In 2014 we published a disclaimer about the forecast. In six years the scenario has changed dramatically. This new disclaimer is meant to single out the situation from 2020 onwards. Taking about the United States and the European Union as separated entities no longer makes sense. Both are the Western block, keep printing money and will share the same fate.

After COVID we can draw two major conclusions:

  1. The Western world success model has been built over societies with no resilience that can barely withstand any hardship, even a low intensity one. It was assumed but we got the full confirmation beyond any doubt.
  2. The COVID crisis will be used to extend the life of this dying economic system through the so called Great Reset.


The Great Reset; like the climate change, extinction rebellion, planetary crisis, green revolution, shale oil (…) hoaxes promoted by the system; is another attempt to slow down dramatically the consumption of natural resources and therefore extend the lifetime of the current system. It can be effective for awhile but finally won’t address the bottom-line problem and will only delay the inevitable. The core ruling elites hope to stay in power which is in effect the only thing that really worries them.

The collapse of the Western financial system - and ultimately the Western civilization - has been the major driver in the forecast along with a confluence of crisis with a devastating outcome. As COVID has proven Western societies embracing multiculturalism and extreme liberalism are unable to deal with any real hardship. The Spanish flu one century ago represented the death of 40-50 million people. Today the world’s population is four times greater with air travel in full swing which is by definition a super spreader. The death casualties in today’s World would represent 160 to 200 million in relative terms but more likely 300-400 million taking into consideration the air travel factor that did not exist one century ago. So far, COVID death toll is roughly 1 million people. It is quite likely that the economic crisis due to the lockdowns will cause more deaths than the virus worldwide.

The Soviet system was less able to deliver goodies to the people than the Western one. Nevertheless Soviet society was more compact and resilient under an authoritarian regime. That in mind, the collapse of the Soviet system wiped out 10 percent of the population. The stark reality of diverse and multicultural Western societies is that a collapse will have a toll of 50 to 80 percent depending on several factors but in general terms the most diverse, multicultural, indebted and wealthy (highest standard of living) will suffer the highest toll. The only glue that keeps united such aberrant collage from falling apart is overconsumption with heavy doses of bottomless degeneracy disguised as virtue. Nevertheless the widespread censorship, hate laws and contradictory signals mean that even that glue is not working any more. Not everybody has to die migration can also play a positive role in this.

The formerly known as second and third world nations are an unknown at this point. Their fate will depend upon the decisions they take in the future. Western powers are not going to take over them as they did in the past because these countries won’t be able to control their own cities far less likely countries that are far away. If they remain tied to the former World Order they will go down along Western powers but won’t experience the brutal decline of the late because they are poorer and not diverse enough but rather quite homogenous used to deal with some sort of hardship but not precisely the one that is coming. If they switch to China they can get a chance to stabilize but will depend upon the management of their resources.

We expected this situation to unfold and actually is unfolding right now with the November election triggering a major bomb if Trump is re-elected. If Biden is elected there will very bad consequences as well. There is a lot of bad blood in the Western societies and the protests, demonstrations, rioting and looting are only the first symptoms of what is coming. However a new trend is taking place overshadowing this one.

The situation between the three great powers has changed dramatically. The only relevant achievement of the Western powers during the past decade has been the formation of a strategic alliance, both military and economic, between Russia and China. Right now the potential partnership between Russia and the European Union (EU) is dead with Russia turning definitively towards China. That was from the beginning the most likely outcome. Airbus never tried to establish a real partnership but rather a strategy to fade away the Russian aerospace industry. Actually Russia and China have formed a new alliance to build a long haul airliner. Western Europe (not to mention the United States) was never interested in the development of Russia or forming anything other than a master slave relationship with Russia providing raw materials and toeing the line of the West. It was clear then and today is a fact.

Russia has been preparing for a major war since 2008 and China has been increasing her military capabilities for the last 20 years. Today China is not a second tier power compared with the United States. Both in military and economic terms China is at the same level and in some specific areas are far ahead. In the domain of high-tech 5G has been a success in the commercial realm but the Type 055 destroyer is also another breakthrough with the US gaining a similar capability (DDG 51 Flight IIII) by mid of this decade (more likely by 2030). Nanchang, the lead ship of the Type 055 class, was commissioned amid the pandemic and lockdown in China.

Six years ago the likelihood of a major war was tiny. Since then it has grown steadily and dramatically and today is by far the most likely major event in the 2020s. The ultimate conflict can come from two ways. A conventional conflict involving at least two major powers that escalates into an open nuclear war. A second scenario is possible in the 2025-2030 timeframe. A Russian sneak first strike against the United States and its allies with the new S-500, strategic missile defenses, Yasen-M submarines, INF Zircon and Kalibr missiles and some new space asset playing the key role. The sneak first strike would involve all Russian missile strategic forces branches (bombers and ground-based missiles) at the different stages of such attack that would be strategic translation of what was seen in Syria in November 2015. There was no report that the Russian had such a capability of launching a high precision, multiple, combined arms attack at targets 2,000+ kilometers away. Western intelligence had no clue. The irony is that since the end of the Cold War the United States has been maneuvering through NATO to achieve a position to execute a first strike over Russia and now it seems that the first strike may occur but the country finished would be the United States.

Another particularity of the Western system is that its individuals have been brainwashed to the point that the majority accept their moral high ground and technological edge as a given. This has given the rise of the supremacy of the emotional arguments over the rational ones which are ignored or deprecated. That mindset can play a key role in the upcoming catastrophic events. At least in the Soviet system the silent majority of the people were aware of the fallacies they were fed up. We can see the United States claims about G5 being stolen from them by China or hypersonic technology being stolen by Russia as the evidence that the Western elites are also infected by that hubris. Over the next decade it will become obvious that the West is falling behind the Russia-China block and the malaise might grow into desperation. Going to war might seem a quick and easy solution to restore the lost hegemony to finally find them into a France 1940 moment. Back then France did not have nuclear weapons to turn a defeat into a victory. The West might try that swap because the unpleasant prospect of not being Mars and Venus but rather a bully and his dirty bitch running away in fear while the rest of the world is laughing at them.

If there is not a dramatic change of course the world is going to witness the first nuclear war. The Western block collapse may come before, during or after the war. It does not matter. A nuclear war is a game with billions of casualties and the collapse plays in the hundreds of millions.
 
There is a lot of rubbish on the net. This above may be just more of it. Though someone has gone to quite a bit of trouble to compile the stats by country and post it, and has made no obvious attempt at attracting a wide audience, which makes it more weird. The stats are of interest as a US (NATO) war with China seems more likely than ever before.

The wording suggests to me English isnt the persons 1st language. They are pretty good, but not a native. My guess is Eastern bloc rather than a Chinese author. Russians are more likely to call climate change a hoax etc. Some of the language is more right side of politics than left, with a bias of comparisons towards the Soviet experience. Where he says Soviet society was more 'compact and resilient', part of that means they had a home garden, chickens, etc and were self sufficient to some point. In the west, very few of us have a even partly sustaining home garden. A breakdown of our society would be much worse for us, than for example countries that still grow a garden at home.

The analytics are quite well done, and bloody scary. Basically the Western aligned countries are decimated. The US to have 66% (from memory) casualties. Australia to have 35%, with would be easily achievable by Just bombing Melbourne, Sydney and the subsequent breakdown of society.

Countries of the EU get decimated, (NATO) while Asia, Africa are relatively unscathed. In a Nuke war between the US, China and Russia, the west, Russia and China would all cop the brunt, though in the stas at the website, Russia and China are relatively unscathed. Very hard to believe that would happen, unless there was a treasonous plot by Elites in the US to sabotage a US response. The way the CIA, FBI are behaving, that is a quite possible scenario. It really does look like the President although possibly the winner of the next election, is impotent in controlling his Intel services and perhaps even the Military.

Our historic and continued alignment with the US will/would make us a target. China has already said some scary things to us about our future if we remain in the US allegiance.

If there really is a NWO, with an agenda for a world government, and there really is a Globalist play for a 'great reset' with the USA giving up (or having its ascendency taken from it) the elite (and the US generals) already have their bunkers, the US has treasonous actors at all levels in media, industry and military, the possibility of a sabotaged military nuke response to a 1st attack by China/Russia, makes the stats at the link relevant.

Interesting enough for someone to go to a lot of trouble to compile.
 
Last edited:
A good analysis of deagel.com - basically the predictions are unsourced, based on guesswork and already inaccurate in some cases:

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top