Search results for query: *

I mean after he complained of swelling. The swelling might have been worse the following day, after the match day report. Surely you make a claim in the interview, the AFL call the club and get an evaluation. But groin contact should be games regardless of swelling.

Surely there is a medical report, or anyone can make stuff up for revenge. On SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app

Expected that from some one. Truth will illicit a jibe every time.

The reverse Cotchin Rule. We didn't read that carefully enough.

Based on the fact we are playing Richmond next, our side is already depleted and we need him; 1 week. On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app

If umpires did their job properly and impartially no one would complain. On SM-G930F using BigFooty.com mobile app

The "First to the Ball" argument is wishy washy at best to explain the FK count. It's a glib one liner that is a simple justification. There is no link with being 1st to the ball and FK count. Especially 1st to the ball being explained solely by the CP stat (which includes the FK). The...

Please don't count contested possessions because ALL your frees for are contested possessions. It's not so much the frees for, but the unpaid ones the other way that are bullshit. That's the contested possession differential right there. Every free paid in the centre square will count as a...

More clean with the trowing by Libba ;)

You mean the ones which were marks anyway but paid as frees? Oh yeah those ones..... three of those and then the blatant in the back to Sloane...... So 1 really.

The problem is his eyes are not functioning properly. Just look at the angle they pop out of is googly eye sockets. Needs a vision check and if that's ok a lie detector.

I take it you missed all the throws that were missed out of the centre square by the dogs? Also the head on charges that got called high, when that is supposed to be prior opportunity.

It's been happening all year. I noticed it in games in round 2 and 3 as well.

Except Gov dived on the ball in front of Tex after he committed. Could have taken Tex's legs out if Tex didn't turn sideways. Will be looked at. Tex to get more weeks than Hodge for trying to play nutcrackers on Wingard's head.... Should be dismissed, though.

Yep because these are the only times he's been in trouble.......

From 2008: How far do we need to go back to make it serial? http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/hawks-under-corking-scrutiny/story-e6frf38c-1111116212403

Especially since Stratton pulled up hard when he saw Wingard head toward the line, but Hodge accelerates towards him. Giving him 2 was the soft option. They can pretend to punish, but not have a "star' missing finals action.

I completely agree with over officiating. But if the can't call a mark correctly, twice, how in the world are they going to get the finer points right?

Both of those and the armchair ride a certain Richmond player gets with pretty much any physical contact. Either all players get that protection from bruising footy or none do. I'd prefer if none did. I hate bruise free footy.

How was Kreuzer's "mark" not a mark. Dead set clanger of a decision. Makes me sick that umpires make clanger decisions but still get to umpire.

It actually states "bumping or making forceful contact". Sent from my GT-I9295 using Tapatalk

Viney elected to enter a contest with two people travelling directly at him, the result of which was always going to be impact. Electing to contest and high contact together leave the tribunal no option. It's a dumb rule. The definition of negligence makes Viney's decision to contest...

Oh, Really? No! O'Rielly

This whole bump thing is seriously stuffed up. Franklins hit was way late. A lot later than others who got weeks for "fair" bumps. This whole bumping getting weeks is seriously making me hate some aspects of the game. If the bump is in the contest and initial contact is not with the head it...

Football is a contact sport. Didn't think he was lined up or hit late..... One of those unavoidable collisions for mine. Play on.

The argument was never that they should be equal. The free kick count along with the replay that shows the inconsisency in decisions on non paid frees to Port Power, plus the umpire patting the Norf player on the bum is clearly enough to warrant the question about bias being asked.

Then don't just stand there, go for the ball. Ban leg first sliding.

I thought Vlad favoured 2 subs and a cap together.

Will the cap be 80 rotations or will it be something higher like 120 so that there are still a highish number of rotations but coaches can go crazy with 150 per game? If capped at 80, things will back fire either 1 of two things will happen. Coaches will play a super defensive keepy-offies...

I'd suggest you watch it again with me and I'll slow mo it so you can see what everyone is talking about.