Search results for query: *

I misread the thread title and thought a pies player by the surname “toucher” was getting banned for a year lol

Rich people have also minimised tax to zero so they probably would qualify under means test anyway

Cost of implementing means testing may be prohibitive. Flat cash grants are by nature progressive (as opposed to flat taxes or fees which are regressive)

I don’t see the problem

Now the raw talent in terms of draft picks are unquestionably north The question doesn’t take into account player development…

Or even just drop this stupid cap floor that will enable bottom clubs to pay players what they are worth and build proper warchests

I did recall the radio commentary mentioning he was hobbling in the third quarter.

So what was wrong with my hit the academies/ father son? Keeps the rest of the draft accessible

Can you expand on this? For me the issue has always been draft bidding- that if a player is a first round talent they shouldn’t be denied to any club willing to use their first rounder - and I’m also now getting there with father son too.

The AFL did go on to fix the heck up that led to JUH being eligible The same needs to be done to the Northern academies (so first round picks can't be matched)

I can’t see us winning but yes it would put all that pressure back on and some

Harsh after all his comparison is north Melbourne and losing finals last year..

As an ED worker I am aware that the elective surgery target is a natural enemy of our ability to get bed access from the ED. So increasing ED demand and acuity would have broken ability to achieve this, and of course out of self interest I will prioritise bed access over elective surgery. Of...

The claim is that electromagnetic radiation from train line could interfere with machines. Whether it was a practical thing to check pre announcement I don’t know - better than building it and going heck… I think as response they will increase size of RMH. The staff for the Arden street were...

The general point (that umpires need to pay htb a lot faster) is valid as I believe it will also reduce the players getting tackled to ground and then leading to head injury

Which Democrat female would they use? Kamala is quite unpopular from my limited observation

What if trump was to die of natural causes (Or what appear to be natural- IM suxamethonium will just look like hypoxic cardiac arrest…)

The sack Hinkley thread will be cheering on the hawks

I did note how any jury that gave Israel more than a 3 point vote copped abuse (song was not great - and that’s without knowing the original lyrics). What surprised was the public vote for the song.

Doesn’t it? If she swallowed then bibi is not born..?

Bibi is an antisemitic piece of self interested s**t I will wear any demerit points for this comment with pride. As opposed to the Australian people on public vote picking the Israeli song as the top choice (ffs the Croatian entry was much better absent any political leanings)

Dump him and put Haley as the GOP candidate and the republicans would absolutely clean up at the election

Hmm it included father/sons. And the targeting is to get at players who are outside of usual draft channels. It’s also limited to one player per club. And north are unlikely to take full use (would need to create enough list space)

Would be funny if your first finals win took out port and got them to sack Hinkley.

Oh not arguing about expand to f/s just having capped duration of this. But will add on reflection that the club losing the academy/ father son can offer north a player and if forth find that acceptable they will keep their academy/ father son player. Gets north experienced players without...

I was thinking just one year and review if they still need it.

Novel pp idea though - get to pick a player from each of the northern academies as a correction for the advantage those academies give. This doesn’t hurt the other rebuilding clubs.

They will get one effectively by zurhaar leaving and herbs and spices applied to contract. Or genuinely get massively overpaid via a “ambassador payment “

Tbh I thought this was actually fair to ask at the time as it was a narrative being mentioned via afl media What we have learnt is that purple (Barrett) is a dumbheck.

Because he is the one who is lying so of course he doesn’t want the focus there