Search results for query: *

If anyone wants to contribute comment your ideas. I will post weekly updates of where our rules are at. I have the ratings (subject to change) courtesy of www.statsinsider.com.au/sport-hub/afl/player-ratings The game is going to include; Trades and Free Agency, Draft, Player Progression and...

Sydney sneaky one though. Premiers (2005, 2012). Runners Up (2006, 2014, 2016, 2022). Been disappointing in Grannys though.

I think he meant 3 or more premierships. That being said Collingwood deserves to be up there after Premierships in 2010 and 2023, and runners up in 2002-03.

North will easily be better here in my opinion. Good pool of solid young stars (Mckercher, Sheezel, Wardlaw, Duursma), combine that with a couple of decent superstars (LDU, Larkey, Simpkin). Just missing the veteran leadership but so are west coast.

Good point. But still think Luke Jackson would be a gun as a full time ruck.

Brent Stanton is a good pick, extremely underrated.

I think that Clayton Oliver has just been causing controversy after controversy and he is probably on his last chance. If he doesn't play well I have a feeling everything could go downhill really quickly. Any thoughts?

I reckon they should package Darcy for a gun forward and let Luke Jackson thrive as a full time ruckman

I meant that since Collingwood were miles ahead of Carlton last year, they will be even better because their recruits have been much better.

I don't like the 'Maynard Rule' because I reckon that too much of it is left up to interpretation. They should make a definitive rule so that there is less wriggle room.

I personally think that Collingwood will be much better than Carlton as they have added some really handy assets.

I just tried to download the game and the website does not work. Anyone have any idea of what I can do?